Skip to content

Effect of an Intervention in Coping with Occupational Stress in firefighters military

Effectiveness of an Intervention on the Management of Occupational Stress in military firefighters: Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-8dmbzc
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2020-09-23
Start date
2021-08-29
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Occupational Stress

Interventions

A total of 100 firefighters participated, of which 51 participated in the intervention group and 49 in the control group. The non-pharmacological intervention carried out for the management of occupat
and Improvement in Coping, which means “facilitation of cognitive and behavioral efforts to control stressors, changes or perceived threats that interfere with meeting the demands of life and roles” (

Sponsors

Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro
Lead Sponsor
Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Firefighters of both sexes; without sick leave during the collection period; residents in the city of Uberaba.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Firefighters who were undergoing psychological therapeutic treatment, as this fact could interfere with the intervention that the participant would receive.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
It is expected to find increased values ??of coping factors after the application of the intervention in a period of six weeks, the higher the scores, the better the individual's strategies in managing occupational stress. Coping factors are represented by eight types: confrontation, withdrawal, self-control, social support, acceptance of responsibility, avoidance, problem solving and positive reappraisal, and the main factor is social support. Coping factors were measured based on responses from the Folkman and Lazarus Coping Inventory (SAVÓIA; SANTANA; MEJIAS, 1996). The score values ??were evaluated by the mean difference in scores for each coping factor, obtained after subtracting the scores for each factor, pre- and post-intervention or standard routine, in both experimental and control groups. To analyze the mean difference between the scores of these coping factors pre and post intervention or standard routine between the groups, Student's t test with Welch correction for independent samples was used. For the positive reappraisal coping factor, the Mann-Whitney test for independent samples was used. Coping factor scores were obtained using descriptive statistics with measures of central tendency (mean and median) and variability (amplitudes, standard deviation, minimum and maximum values). This research considered a significance level of a= 5%. It was observed that after the intervention, the mean differences in the scores of coping factors such as social support (p = 0.009), acceptance of responsibility (p = 0.03), problem solving (p = 0.05) and positive reappraisal (p = 0.05), increased significantly after intervention in the experimental group. Being the impact of the intervention with moderate magnitude for the scores of the social support factor (d = 0.54). The intervention enabled the recognition of management in the management of occupational stress, being effective for military firefighters, in which social support, the main factor, appeared as an eff

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
It is expected to find a reduction in occupational stress scores after the application of the intervention in a period of six weeks. The higher the stress scores, the worse the individual's mental health and the more prone to stress-related mental disorders. Stress measured from the responses of the Stress Scale at Work (EET) (PASCHOAL; TAMAYO, 2004). The mean difference in stress scores was obtained after subtracting the stress scores, pre- and post-intervention or standard routine, in both experimental and control groups. To analyze the mean difference between pre- and post-intervention stress scores or standard routine between the groups, the non-parametric Mann-Whitney test for independent samples was used. Stress scores were obtained using descriptive statistics with measures of central tendency (mean, median, mean rank) and variability (amplitudes, standard deviation, minimum and maximum values). This research considered a significance level of a= 5%. The expected value was not found, as there was no change in scores after the intervention program (p= 0.42).;It is expected to find a reduction in Compassion Fatigue and Burnout scores, and an increase in Compassion Satisfaction after the application of the intervention over a period of six weeks. The lower burnout and compassion fatigue and higher compassion satisfaction, the better mental health standards and lower job stress. Burnout, compassion fatigue and compassion satisfaction were measured based on responses from the Professional Quality of Life Scale - BR (ProQol-BR) (LAGO; CODO, 2013). The average of the differences between the Fatigue due to Compassion, Satisfaction due to Compassion and Burnout scores were obtained after subtracting these scores before and after the intervention or standard routine, in both the experimental and control groups. To analyze the mean difference between pre- and post-intervention scores or standard routine between the groups, the non-parametric Mann-Whitney test for indepe

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactMarli Coimbra

Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro

marli.apr.coimbra@gmail.com+55-034-37006607

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 7, 2026