Patient Simulation
Conditions
Interventions
Control Group: 20 second year nursing students, after the simulation scene, will be held the debriefing session following the Gibbs model, and after the session will fill out 6 forms for the realizati
Other
Sponsors
Marcella Ferroni Gouvea
Marcella Ferroni Gouvea
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Students registered in the second year of undergraduate Nursing course at the Federal University of Viçosa; and which are studying the discipline "Nursing Skills II; both sexes; age 18 years old
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: It will be excluded from this study, students with training in other higher or technical courses in health; those who already have skill as a professional in the preparation of nursing diagnoses; who do not accept to participate in this research.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Effectiveness of the debriefing technique according to the Gibbs Cycle precepts compared to the 3D Model in the diagnostic thinking ability of nursing students during a clinical simulation activity. | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Comparison of performance in the diagnostic thinking ability of nursing students using two distinct debriefing techniques: Debriefing following the Gibbs model and Debriefing 3D Model (defusing, discovering, and deepening).;Verification of Nursing students' diagnostic reasoning skills through the use of the Diagnostic Thinking Inventory in a debriefing session | — |
Countries
Brazil
Contacts
Public ContactMarcella Gouveia
Universidade Federal de Viçosa
Outcome results
None listed