Tooth Loss Tooth Injuries
Conditions
Interventions
This is a prospective clinical study with a single cohort, without randomization and without masking. Approximately 53 patients aged 6 to 17 years with anterior tooth loss due to avulsion or post-repl
Sponsors
Faculdade de Odontologia - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia
Universidade Federal de Uberlândia
Eligibility
Age
6 Years to 17 Years
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Patients in the growth phase aged between 6 and 17 years; traumatized permanent anterior dentition; single anterior edentulism resulting from tooth avulsion or root resorption following replantation; absence of the tooth in the dental arch or current indication for provisional rehabilitation in the anterior region; healed soft tissues without clinical signs of acute infection; systemic health condition compatible with the proposed treatment; signed informed consent from the patient and legal guardians when applicable; willingness to comply with the full clinical follow-up protocol
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Technical inability to maintain the provisional restoration out of functional occlusion; persistently poor oral hygiene or presence of moderate to severe gingivitis, periodontitis, or active infection at the site; smoking in adolescents; uncontrolled systemic diseases or use of medications that interfere with bone metabolism including chronic systemic corticosteroids, immunosuppressants, or bisphosphonates; refusal or inability to attend scheduled follow-up visits and undergo serial clinical and radiographic assessments over the 24-month period
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| To evaluate implant survival rate at 12 months, defined as the implant remaining in function without mobility pain infection or need for removal, determined through clinical examination performed at baseline and during follow up visits at 7 days, 30 days, 90 days , 80 days and 12 months | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| To evaluate alveolar ridge dimension and stability determined by periapical radiography and cone beam computed tomography at baseline and during follow up; to evaluate mesiodistal space maintenance measured clinically at baseline and during follow up; to evaluate periodontal clinical parameters including visible plaque gingival inflammation probing depth clinical attachment level bleeding on probing and gingival recession during follow up; to evaluate implant and provisional stability determined by absence of mobility during follow up; to evaluate occurrence of complications including pain edema inflammation prosthetic fracture or decementation during follow up; to evaluate aesthetic outcome using Pink Esthetic Score and patient perception regarding mastication aesthetics comfort and satisfaction through structured questionnaire during follow up | — |
Countries
BR
Contacts
Public ContactPriscilla Soares
Faculdade de Odontologia da Universidade Federal de Uberlândia
Outcome results
None listed