Skip to content

Evaluation of how Laser application may influence recovery after wisdom tooth extraction

Analysis of clinical and blood biochemical parameters as a function of irradiation of modified ILIB in extraction of lower third molars

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-88fsw4n
Enrollment
30
Registered
2026-04-23
Start date
2025-08-15
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-04-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Molar, Third Surgery, Oral

Interventions

This is a randomized, double-blind, split-mouth, phase 4, within-person crossover clinical study. Selected individuals will be randomized into 2 groups (n=30 teeth per group), considering the split-mo
however, no radiation will be emitted to the target. The volunteers and the surgeon/researchers, who will be involved in the analyses and interpretations, will not know which group the participant bel

Sponsors

Faculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba da Universidade Estadual de Campinas
Lead Sponsor
Faculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba da Universidade Estadual de Campinas
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 35 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients in good systemic and local health for the procedures; Patients between 18 and 35 years of age; Both sexes; Indication for extraction of third molars (teeth 38 or 48), with at least two-thirds of the root formed, according to the radiographic evaluation, thus belonging to Pell & Gregory classification I or II and position A or B (Pell GJ & Gregory GT, 1933)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with mandibular third molars in positions 3 and C according to the Pell & Gregory classification; Presence of any local manifestations in the area of ??interest that may contraindicate the surgical procedure, such as: pericoronitis, odontogenic cysts and tumors associated or not with the third molar, trauma in the region, or any symptoms that indicate the presence of infection; Patients who smoke or have any type of systemic disease (of any organ system), such as diabetes, systemic arterial hypertension, hyperthyroidism, osteoporosis, or gastrointestinal diseases that compromise the outcome of the surgery; Patients who are intolerant to other materials that will be used in the research, such as 2% chlorhexidine alcohol solution, 0.12% chlorhexidine digluconate solution, and 2% mepivacaine hydrochloride solution with 1:100,000 epinephrine; Female patients who are menstruating, pregnant, or breastfeeding during the surgical procedure; Patients with abnormal sleep patterns, who slept less than 5 hours the night before, or who are taking medications to control psychiatric illnesses, corticosteroids, estrogens, and androgens; Patients who have used anti-inflammatory drugs within 30 days prior to the surgical procedure

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To clinically compare the effectiveness of the protocol in controlling postoperative symptoms (pain, edema, maximum mouth opening and quality of life)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Analyze blood biochemistry through inflammatory markers (IL-1ß, IL-6, IL-10, C-reactive protein, TNF-a and prostaglandin E2), oxidizing substance (superoxide dismutase enzyme) and vasoactive substance (nitric oxide).

Countries

BR

Contacts

Public ContactMileni Souza

Faculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba da Universidade Estadual de Campinas

m252275@dac.unicamp.br+55-17-997793323

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: May 1, 2026