Skip to content

Comparison of Bronchoalveolar Lavage and Tracheal Aspirate in the diagnosis and therapy of ICU patients with Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia

Comparative study of Bronchoalveolar Lavage and Tracheal Aspirate in the diagnosis and treatment of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-86dcdx
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2014-11-25
Start date
2010-08-12
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia

Interventions

Sample size was estimated at 76 patients (38/38) that were randomized to one of the study groups: Group 1: BAL-Group and Group 2: Endotracheal Group. Both BAL fluid (BALF) and EA samples were culture
Procedure/surgery
E05.927.100

Sponsors

Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
Lead Sponsor
Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 90 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: The patients under mechanical ventilation for at least 48 h who presented with new or progressive pulmonary infiltrates on X-rays plus at least two criteria among fever > 38°C, purulent tracheal secretions, and leukocytos greater than 10,000 cells/mm3 or leukopenia of 4,000 cells/mm3, were screened for enrollment.These patients were randomized to undergo BAL (BAL group - 1) or EA (EA group - 2). Both BAL fluid (BALF) and EA samples were quantitaively cultured. The patients whose cultures were positive with more than 10.000 CFU/mL in BALF cultures and with more than 100.000 CFU/mL in quantitatively endotracheal aspirate cultures (QEACs)— were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: The exclusion criteria were a diagnosis of AIDS and inappropriate respiratory samples (> 10 squamous cells in the lower field magnification in EA smears or > 1% bronchial cells in BALF smears). cases with BAL fluid with more than 1% of bronchial cells.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Similarity of 28-day mortality rate between the study group in the hospital until their discharge or their death, which one that ocurred first, from an estimated rate of 40% with a variation of 10%. The 28-day mortality rate was calculated through the number of deaths in this period (since the inclusion in the study) over the number of patients observed/included. Result: BAL group: 25,0% Tracheal aspirate group: 37,8%  p= 0,353

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Similarity of the following variables between the study groups: 1. Length of ICU stay (days)(p = 0,797): - BAL Group: 14 , 28:16 (44,5%) - Tracheal Aspirate Group: 14 , 28: 14 (37,9%) 2. Adverse events due to sampling techniques: (p = NS): - BAL Group: Dessaturation (120): 7 (19,4%) - Tracheal Aspirate Group: Dessaturation:(<90%): 3 (8,1%) Sinus tachicardia: 1 (2,7%) Bradicardia: 1 (2,7%) 3. Appropriateness of antibiotic therapy: - BAL Group: 28 (77,8%) - Tracheal Aspirate Group: 30 (83,3%) p = 0,551 4. Rate of modifications in the antibiotic therapy: - BAL Group: 7/8(87,5%) - Tracheal Aspirate Group: 6/6(100%) p = 1,0 5. Occurrence of secondary sepsis: - BAL Group: 20/21 (95,2%) - Tracheal Aspirate Group: 20/21 (95,2%) p = 1,0 6. Occurrence of severe sepsis - BAL Group: 5/25 (20,0%) - Tracheal Aspirate Group: 2/19 (10,5%) p = 0,680 7. Occurrence of septic shock: - BAL Group:10/35(28,6%) - Tracheal Aspirate Group: 15/33(45,5%) p = 0,149 8. VAP recurrence - BAL Group: 0/36 (0%) - Tracheal Aspirate Group:2/36 (5,6%) p = 0,151 9. Need for additional diagnostic procedures: - Second tracheal aspirate: BAL Group: (n1=8? n2=11) 0/8 (0%) Tracheal Aspirate Group: 4/11 (36,4% p = 0,085 - Second BAL: BAL Group: 0/8 (0%) Tracheal Aspirate Group: 0/11 (0%) p = 1,0 - Haemoculture: BAL Group: 2/8 (25,0%) Tracheal Aspirate Group:2/11 (18,2%) p = 1,0 All the outcomes were verified by the investigators through daily visits to the patients in the ward until their discharge or their death, with an expected variation of 10% in the rates between the groups.

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactManoel;Ricardo Rocha;Corrêa

Programa de Pós-Graduação: Infectologia e Medicina Tropical - Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais;Programa de Pós-Graduação: Infectologia e Medicina Tropical - Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais

rochamoc@terra.com.br;racorrea9@gmail.com(31)3409-9746;(31)3409-9255

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)