Fracture of teeth
Conditions
Interventions
Study design, characteristics and location of data collection: This study will be a prospective, longitudinal, randomized, double-blind (examiner and volunteer) and parallel clinical research, with 24
I: veneer cemented with light-cured resin cement specially developed for this purpose
C: Veneer cemented with restorative flowable resin composite
O: clinical performance according to FDI criteria. The research question was: Do veneers cemented with veneer resin cement perform similarly to those cemented with restored restorative flowable resin
presence of antagonists and neighboring teeth making contact, good oral health
aged between 18 and 70 years and both genders. Exclusion criteria will be: extensive coronary destruction that contraindicates a veneer restoration
teeth with spontaneous or constant pain indicative of irreversible pulpiti
Sponsors
Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia de São José dos Campos - Universidade Estadual Paulista
Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia de São José dos Campos - Universidade Estadual Paulista
Eligibility
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: An upper or lower anterior tooth (incisor or canine) requiring indirect veneer restoration; presence of antagonists and neighboring teeth making contact, good oral health; age between 18 and 70 years; both genders
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Extensive coronary destruction that contraindicates a veneer restoration; teeth with spontaneous or constant pain indicative of irreversible pulpitis; presence of periapical lesions; severe systemic disease; allergy to restorative materials; periodontal disease; bruxism; harmful parafunctional habits; history of hypersensitivity in the teeth to be restored
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| To evaluate the clinical success of the restorations after 24 months, using the method proposed by the International Dental Federation, which consists of assigning scores according to biological (six criteria), functional (six criteria) and esthetic (four criteria) properties. For each criterion, the scores clinically excellent, clinically good, clinically satisfactory, clinically unsatisfactory or clinically poor may be applied. The scores excellent, good and satisfactory will be grouped together as ACCEPTABLE “Overall Score” and will represent the clinical success of the restoration. The scores unsatisfactory and poor will be grouped as UNACCEPTABLE “Overall score” and will signify restoration failure. | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| To evaluate the clinical success of the restorations after 12 months, using the method proposed by the International Dental Federation, which consists of assigning scores according to biological (six criteria), functional (six criteria) and esthetic (four criteria) properties. For each criterion, the scores clinically excellent, clinically good, clinically satisfactory, clinically unsatisfactory or clinically poor may be applied. The scores excellent, good and satisfactory will be grouped together as ACCEPTABLE “Overall Score” and will represent the clinical success of the restoration. The scores unsatisfactory and poor will be grouped as UNACCEPTABLE “Overall score” and will signify restoration failure. | — |
Countries
Brazil
Contacts
Public ContactCarlos Torres
Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia da Universidade Estadual Paulista de São José dos Campos
Outcome results
None listed