Skip to content

Comparation between the techniques of Extubation in the Surgical Block and the Intensive Care Unit on the regional lung ventilation assessed by Electric Impedance Tomography in patients undergoing Noninvasive Ventilation following Heart Surgery: a cross-sectional study

Comparation of Ultra-Fast-Track and Fast-Track techniques in the regional lung ventilation assessed by Electrical Impedance Tomography in patient undergoing prophylactic nasal positve airway pressure following Cardiac Surgery: a cross-sectional study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-858qxn
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2018-05-30
Start date
2018-05-04
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Noninvasive ventilation, extubation, thoracic surgery

Interventions

This is a cross-sectional study carried out in a Cardiothoracic Rehabilitation Unit (CTRU) of the Hospital Real Português of Pernambuco between May 2018 and July 2019 with individuals cardiovascular d
time 1 (T1-1 minutes from onset of NIV)
time 2 (T2 - last 5 minutes of NIV) and time 3 (T3 - one hour after disconnecting the NIV).
Procedure/surgery
E02.041.625.591

Sponsors

Universidade Federal de Pernambuco
Lead Sponsor
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 65 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Ages between 18 and 65 years; body mass index between 18.5 and 30 kgm2; undergo the Ultra Fast Track and Fast Track extubation techniques; without chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; pulmonary fibrosis; or chronic renal failure; or associated neuromuscular diseases; and those who have an American Society of Anesthesiologists perioperative risk score of less than 4.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Liver failure; congestive heart failure; dementia and Alsheimer's disease; left ventricular ejection fraction less than 40%; anticonvulsant; antidepressant; psychoactive drug in use and emergency reoperated patients; high surgical risk according to EuroSCORE II; presente cardiopulmonary bypass time great than 120 minutes; bleeding with thoracic drainage great than 100 mLh; renal failure with urine output less than 0.5 mLh in the first 6 hours; increased serum creatinine level less than 50% the baseline; prolonged inotropic and vasodilatory drugs support due to cardiac problems; extubation failure for hypercapnia; more than a failure in the autonomic test; mechanic ventilation assist time greater than 6 hours; hemodynamic instability; cardiogenic shock; severe hypotension with systolic blood pressure less than 90 mmHg; episode abdominal distress; nausea and vomiting; depressed level of consciousness; use of accessory muscle; respiratory rate great than 35 ipm; hypoxemia with PaO2 less than 50 mmHg with FiO2 of 50% or hypercapnia with PaCO2 great than 55 mmHg and with pH less than 7.30.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Expected outcome 1 Alteration of ventilation and aeration lung, determined by electrical impedance tomography with a difference of at least 10% between the two groups. Data collected at baseline and at the end of the study.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Expected outcome 2 Reduction of 5% of arterial carbon dioxide pressure (paCO2), measured through arterial blood gas done at the beginning and at the end of the study.;Expected outcome 3 Increase of 5% of arterial oxygen pressure (PaO2), measured through arterial blood gas done at the beginning and at the end of the study.;Expected outcome 4 Increase of 5% in the oxygenation index (PaO2 / FiO2), measured through arterial blood gas done at the beginning and at the end of the study.

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactDaniella Brandão

Universidade Federal de Pernambuco

daniellacunha@hotmail.com+55(081)981359335

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)