Platelet Rich Plasma infiltration for Hip Bursitis

Comparison of Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) infiltration with Corticosteroid + Local anesthetic in patients with Hip tendinobursitis

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 2

Study type

Interventional

Source

REBEC

Registry ID

RBR-82gqqk

Enrollment

Unknown

Registered

2015-04-07

Start date

2011-07-31

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Trochanteric bursitis

Interventions

Twenty hips with diagnosis of hip tendinobursitis underwent extra-articular infiltration guided by ultrasound after they signed an informed consent. All the patients were blind because they didn't kno

Drug

Biological/vaccine

A12.207.152.693.600

Eligibility

Age

18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Twenty hips; both genders; aged eighteen to seventy nine years; more than three months of lateral hip pain; pain over the greater trochanter; painful with forced hip abduction; pain at rest; magnetic resonance imaging with diagnosis of tendinobursitis.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Previous hip infiltrations; intra articular hip disorders; spinal disorders; sciatic; neurological diseases associated with motor abnormalities; fibromyalgia; polyarthralgia or any other rheumatological diagnoses.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Assessment of pain (by Facial Expressions Scale for Pain) and function (by the Harris Hip Score and the Western Ontario MacMaster Score) before the procedure, after ten, thirty and sixty days. It was expected an improvement in pain and function in both groups and that the PRP would be more effective than triamcinolone.;Only the corticosteroid group showed statistically significant average improvement from the pre-treatment time point to the other time points (p <0.05) for the Facial Expressions Scale for Pain and Western Ontario MacMaster Score.	—

Measure

Time frame

Assessment of pain (by Facial Expressions Scale for Pain) and function (by the Harris Hip Score and the Western Ontario MacMaster Score) before the procedure, after ten, thirty and sixty days. It was expected an improvement in pain and function in both groups and that the PRP would be more effective than triamcinolone.;Only the corticosteroid group showed statistically significant average improvement from the pre-treatment time point to the other time points (p <0.05) for the Facial Expressions Scale for Pain and Western Ontario MacMaster Score.

—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Evaluation of hip range of motion and strength by physical exam before the procedures. Record the evolution of strength and hip movement; occurrence of infection, musculotendinous rupture and/or Trendelenburg's sign after ten, thirty and sixty days.;We had no adverse effects in this study. There were no cases of infection, musculotendinous rupture or Trendelenburg's sign.	—

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactArthur Ribeiro

Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo

arthur.quadril@hotmail.com+55(11)983054266

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)