Skip to content

Evaluation of different treatments for lesions on the cervix

130/5000 Clinical evaluation with simplified polishing techniques in composite resin restorations in caries-free cervical lesions. - POLIPERIO: Influence of different composites and polishing techniques on periodontal tissues close to non-carious cervical lesions - randomized clinical trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-7yyznm
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2019-02-26
Start date
2014-01-15
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Other specified diseases of hard tissues of teeth

Interventions

Control Group AA (CONTAA): the participants will be submitted to the treatment through restorations made in resin and polishing technique of the same manufacturer (A), respecting the instructions of t
Procedure/surgery
E06.323.428

Sponsors

Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná
Lead Sponsor
Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná
Collaborator

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Adults between the ages of 18 and 60; Non-carious cervical lesions (LCNC) present in posterior teeth in at least 2 hemiarcs, (splited month study model, with the following characteristics: at least 1mm deep, lesions larger than approximately 5 mm in the occlusal-gingival sense and about 2 to 3 mm deep); Absence of periodontal disease; LCNC teeth should have occlusal contact with the antagonist; have occlusal balance and absence of premature contacts.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: To have active periodontal disease; have any degree of tooth mobility; Have uncontrolled caries activity; Xerostomia; Being in orthodontic treatment; Bearing mandibular temporal dysfunction; History of systemic diseases with repercussions on the gingiva and periodontal tissues; History of adverse reaction to any of the materials used in this study; have parafuncional habit; Use of myorelaxant apparatus; Pregnancy or lactation.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Maintenance of Periodontal SILNESS & LÖE Plate indexes during the evaluation times, measured in%, submitted to statistical analysis, p <0.05, in the comparison between experimental groups and evaluation times.;Maintenance of LÖE & SILNESS gingival indices during the evaluation times, measured in%, submitted to statistical analysis, p <0.05, in the comparison between the experimental groups and evaluation times.;Maintenance of the probing depth indices during the evaluation times, measured in mm submitted to statistical analysis, p <0.05, in the comparison between the experimental groups and times of evaluation.;Maintenance of the bleeding index during the evaluation times, measured in%, submitted to statistical analysis, p <0.05, in the comparison between the experimental groups and times of evaluation.;Maintenance of the bleeding index during the evaluation times, measured in%, submitted to statistical analysis, p <0.05, in the comparison between the experimental groups and times of evaluation. 7. Maintenance of the USPHS criteria during the evaluation times, measured in scores, submitted to statistical analysis, p <0.05, in the comparison between the experimental groups and times of evaluation. 8. Maintenance of the number of inflammatory cells present, according to the classification of Papanicolau during the evaluation times, measured in scores, submitted to statistical analysis, p <0.05, in the comparison between the experimental groups and the time of evaluation. 9. Maintenance of the amount of crevicular fluid absorbed during the evaluation times, measured in mm2, submitted to statistical analysis, p <0.05, in the comparison between the experimental groups and evaluation times: initial, 30, 60, 120, 180 days and 3 years.;Maintenance of the USPHS criteria during the evaluation times, measured in scores, submitted to statistical analysis, p <0.05, in the comparison between the experimental groups and times of evaluation.;Maintenance of the number of inflammator

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Restoration success rate maintenance, measured in% submitted to statistical analysis, p <0.05, in the comparison between experimental groups and evaluation times: initial, 30, 60, 120, 180 days and 3 years.

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactMarcio Mendonça

Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná

dr.mendonca@uol.com.br+554532203130

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)