Skip to content

Effect of video game training and conventional physiotherapy on improving the balance of the elderly

Effects of Cognitive Motor Training in real and virtual environments on postural control of the elderly: a clinical trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-7y6f3j
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2018-05-14
Start date
2016-08-20
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Aged, postural balance, gait and cognition

Interventions

Experimental Group: 10 elderlies will participate of 14 training sessions with 4 Kinect Adventures games. Control Group: 10 elderlies will participate of 14 training sessions of motor-cognitive train
Other
E02.760.169.063.500.387
F04.754.137.506.662

Sponsors

Universidade de São Paulo
Lead Sponsor
Universidade de São Paulo
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
60 Years to 120 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Community dwelling elderly individuals, aged 65 years or over; of both sexes; with a functional state capable of remaining standing, and walking without assistance; without cognitive impairment in the Mini-Mental State Examination89 (<18 for illiterate individuals and <26 for those with an educational level greater than 8 years); normal or corrected hearing acuity (Whisper Test)90; normal or corrected visual acuity (Snellen)91; with no prior experience with the games of the system; and who sign the Free and Clear Informed Consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Neurological and orthopedic diseases; the inability to remain in a standing position or walk without assistance; cardiorespiratory diseases that result in clinical alterations; angina; cardiac insufficiency; decompensated blood pressure; behavioral alterations that interfere with the development of the study; incapacitating pain; a history of seizures; and missing more than three consecutive sessions without replacement.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Expected outcome: Improvement of postural balance Method used to verify expected outcome: Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (MiniBest) Parameters: improvement of the postural control will be considered the increase of at least 10% in the total score of the Minibest after the intervention and 30 days after the end of the intervention.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Expected outcome: improvement of postural balance Method used to verify expected outcome: Posturography, data obtained from the records of the Accu Gait Optimized ™ force platform Parameters: a reduction of at least 10% in the displacement of the center of pressure (COP) during the orthostatic posture obtained after the intervention and 30 days after the end of the intervention will be considered an improvement of the postural balance.;Expected outcome: improvement of cardio-respiratory capacity Method used to verify expected outcome: 6-minute step test Parameters: cardio-respiratory capacity will be considered to be improved by at least 10% increase in the number of step increments obtained after the intervention and 30 days after the end of the intervention.;Expected outcome: improvement in walking speed Method used to verify expected outcome: 10 meter walk test Parameters: an improvement in walking speed will be considered by increasing at least 10% of gait speed score obtained after intervention and 30 days after the end of the intervention.;Expected outcome: improvement in working memory Method used to verify expected outcome: Memory Check-up Test Parameters: memory improvement will be considered by increasing at least 10% of the score of the number of hits obtained after the intervention and 30 days after the end of the intervention.

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactEliana Varise

Universidade de São Paulo

elianavarise@gmail.com+55 (11) 50834951

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)