Skip to content

Effects of the combination of strengthening exercises and blood flow block on hand strength gain

Comparison of different strengthening protocols associated with blood flow restriction to increase handgrip strength

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-7y35v6
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2019-10-21
Start date
2018-04-15
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Muscle weakness

Interventions

Blood flow restriction protocol Blood flow restriction pressure (mmHg) was performed using a sphygmomanometer. Prior to measuring blood flow restriction, the volunteers sat at rest for five minutes. S
Loenneke et al., 2012). Strengthening Protocol Eight sessions of strengthening the wrist extensor muscles were performed, twice a week (between evaluation and reassessment) and a minimum inte
30 mW
20 J / cm2
0.06 cm2
1.2 J with 40 s per point totaling 10.8 J. • 830 nm
30mW
0.116 cm 2
2.3 J with 8
Other
G11.427.410.698.277

Sponsors

Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina- UFSC
Lead Sponsor
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina- UFSC
Collaborator

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Female
Age
18 Years to 25 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Female volunteers; aged between 18 and 25 years old; students; and able to perform the proposed activities were included.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Volunteers with a history of forearm injury that compromised muscle integrity; or who had a history of fractures in the wrist and fingers, upper limb pain; hypertensive patients; heart disease; cognitive impairment; manual workers; and practitioners were excluded of physical activities.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Handgrip and lateral caliper muscle strength gain, verified by Jamar® dynamometer and lateral caliper by Pinch Gauge®, respectively, by comparing intra and intergroups to a significance level of 5%.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
No Secondary Outcomes Expected

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactVivian Florianovicz

Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina- UFSC

vflorianovicz@gmail.com+55-54-991552261

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)