Skip to content

Conventional Percutaneous surgery vs. Endoscopic Combined Intrarenal surgery for the treatment of large Kidney Stones

Conventional percutaneous nephrolithotomy with flexible antegrade nephroscopy vs. Endoscopic Combined Intrarenal Surgery (ECIRS): a prospective randomized study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-7xzcmg7
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2021-10-13
Start date
2021-10-31
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Kidney Calculi

Interventions

The selected patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio between PCNL and ECIRS groups (52 patients each group), stratified by Guy's stone score grades (20), according to a randomization table generate

Sponsors

Hospital das Clinicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo
Lead Sponsor
Hospital das Clinicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Adults aged 18 or over with kidney stones greater than 20 mm, candidates for PCNL in Barts position; Signed informed consent .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Impossibility to perform retrograde ureteroscopy (e.g., urinary reconstruction); Contraindications to PCNL (untreated urinary infection, uncorrected coagulopathy, ipsilateral kidney tumor, pregnancy); Concurrent ureteral stone or simultaneous bilateral approach; Uncontrolled comorbidities; Refusal to sign consent.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Primary outcome 1: Stone free rate; acessed by CT scan, defined as no residual calculi or residual fragments up to 2mm; percentage rate in each group;Primary outcome 2: surgical success rate; acessed by CT scan, defined as residual fragments up to 4mm; percentage rate in each group

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary outcome 1: access rate to all calyces; acessed by intraoperative nephroscopy; percentage rate in each group;Secondary outcome 2: intraoperative detection of residual fragments; acessed by intraoperative nephroscopy; percentage rate in each group;Secondary outcome 3: complication rate; acessed by the modified Clavien grading system at the end of follow up; percentage rate in each group;Secondary outcome 4: stone burden reduction; acessed by CT scan, comparing the stone volume at the begining and end of study; volume reduction (percentage) in each group

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactAnderson Pellanda
pellanda.anderson@gmail.com+5511987878689

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)