Skip to content

How to make women with fibromyalgia become interested in physical exercises daily?

How to motivate women with fibromyalgia to join the exercise continued?

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-7xc5kj
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2015-06-02
Start date
2013-01-21
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

fibromyalgia

Interventions

Intervention group: 15 patients will follow a program with one session per week supervised aerobic exercise lasting 30 minutes and stretching exercises lasting 10 minutes during eight weeks
Group control: 15 patients will receive an educational talk about fibromyalgia, with 60 minutes duration, stressing the importance of aerobic exercise, accompanied by the delivery of an explanatory bo
Other
Q65.060
E02.779.483

Sponsors

Universidade de São Paulo - Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto
Lead Sponsor
Universidade de São Paulo - Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto
Collaborator

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Female
Age
18 Years to 65 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Women from 18 years diagnosed with fibromyalgia performed by rheumatologists; according to the American College of Rheumatology (ACR 1990). The estimated sample size was 30 volunteers.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Women who have comorbidities which is a contraindication to physical activity; recent change of medication (in the last two weeks); and / or already do moderate-intensity physical activities regularly (more than 30 minutes up to three times per week)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
EXPECTED OUTCOME   It was expected to evaluate and to compare intergroup adherence to exercise continued for two different approaches: Educational lecture with educational booklet delivery (GO), and through classroom exercise (GS), verifying thus which of the groups were greater adherence. It was considered as "accession" who carried out the recommended minimum of required sessions, ie 3 sessions per week, from 8 weeks to revaluation, and three months for follow-up. The number of sessions held was considered as the tracking spreadsheet filled by the participant, regardless of location done if during supervised care session or on their own. The level of adhesion between the groups was verified by comparing the periods evaluated, through adhesion percentage, using the qui-quadrado test for comparison between groups.;OUTCOME FOUND   Although the adhesion percentage was higher in the guidance group (GO) regarding the supervised group (GS), there was no statistically significant difference in both the revaluation (chi square = 0.048) and at follow-up (chi square = 0.024) comparing the membership fee between GS and GO, with p> 0.05 in both analyzes.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
EXPECTED OUTCOME  It was evaluated secondarily, physical function and severity of symptoms between participants who joined or not the proposed program. The assessment of physical function was performed by the 6-minute walk test, the severity of painful symptoms was evaluated by visual analog scale and depressive symptoms using the Beck Depression Inventory. For statistical analysis, ANOVA models were used, considering p <0.05. It was expected improvement in painful symptoms and physical function among women who adhered to the exercise program.;OUTCOME FOUND   There was no statistically significant difference between women who adhered to the exercise program regarding the improvement in physical function, the painful and depressive symptoms.

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactDaniela Abreu

Universidade de São Paulo - Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto

dabreu@fmrp.usp.br+55(16)3602-3058

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)