Skip to content

Effects of isolated versus combined perineal preparation methods on perineal stretching and muscle strength

Effects of isolated versus combined perineal preparation methods on perineal distensibility and muscle strength

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-7x28v3
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2018-05-04
Start date
2018-03-29
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pregnancy

Interventions

Eight interventions were performed, two per gestational week (starting at the 34th week), in all 4 groups. Participants in the PnM group (n= 24) were subjected to perineal massage. The entire procedur
next, instrument-assisted perineal stretching was performed for 15 minutes. The PnM + IStr 2’ group (n= 24) was also subjected to both procedures
however, the total time of instrument-assisted perineal stretching was reduced from 15 to 2 minutes.
Device
E01.370.600.425
E02.760.169.063.500.387.750

Sponsors

Faculdade de Educação Física e Fisioterapia da Universidade Federal de Uberlândia
Lead Sponsor
Universidade Federal de Uberlândia
Collaborator

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Female
Age
18 Years to 40 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Pregnant women at the 33rd gestational week, in the age group 18-40 years, both primiparous and women who experienced miscarriages before the 21st week of previous pregnancies, who presented muscle strength > 1 (based on the modified Oxford Scale) and who were subjected to vaginal palpation.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Participants who missed two consecutive interventions, who had urinary tract infections during the study and whose pregnancy came to an end before the last evaluation were excluded from the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The Epi-No Delphine Plus® equipment was used to assess the primary outcome (perineal distensibility).

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Peritron® pressure gauge was used to perform pelvic floor manometry in order to analyze the secondary outcome (maximal voluntary contraction).;After delivery, participants responded to a postpartum questionnaire (applied through a phone call). The questionnaire was used to evaluate secondary outcomes associated with childbirth (delivery route and perineal laceration degree).

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactAlana Cabral

Universidade Federal de Uberlândia

alanaleandrocabral@hotmail.com+55034991826560

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)