Skip to content

Use of electrostimulation with Russian current to treat lumbar pain

Analysis of the efficacy of the Russian current in the treatment of lower back pain through muscle hypertrophy

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-7w8txn
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2019-10-24
Start date
2017-08-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

low back pain

Interventions

Volunteers were divided into two groups, only the current Russian group (GCR, n=12) was submitted to the protocol of treatment of low back pain by means of the Russian chain, consisting of 12 sessions
Device
E05.723.402

Sponsors

Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE)
Lead Sponsor
Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE)
Collaborator

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Female
Age
18 Years to 30 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: The study included sedentary female individuals; with a maximum age of 30 years; height 1.70 m; weight 75.0 kg and BMI 25 kg/m2; who presented chronic non-specific low back pain (presence of low back pain for at least 12 weeks); with a convenience sample

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Individuals with surgeries in the lumbar region; skin lesions in the region to be stimulated; pregnant women; diagnosis of neurological or musculoskeletal problems (others than chronic lumbar pain); and the performance of physiotherapeutic treatment in the last three months from the day of the evaluation were discarded; besides the non-agreement to participate in the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Expected outcome 1. Imaging of the multifidus muscle;Endpoint found 1. image collection of the multifidus muscle, bilaterally (averaged between the sides) and in relaxation. The cross-sectional area of the trunk musculature was obtained by ultrasound (Shimadzu SDU 450xl, Columbia, USA), with a 7.5 MHz linear B-mode transducer. Evaluations occurred prior to the beginning of treatment, at the end of the application of the protocol, and one month after the last session.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Expected outcome 1. Visual analogue scale of pain ;Expected outcome 5. Pressure pain threshold;Expected outcome 3. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI);Expected outcome 4. Evaluation of the resistance of the musculature ;Endpoint found 2. VAS was used to quantify the intensity and perception of the individual's pain, being graded according to ordinal scores: no pain (0), mild pain (1 to 2), moderate (3 to 5) and intense (6 to 10).;Endpoint found 3. The scale ODI consists of 10 questions with six alternatives, whose value ranges from 0 to 5. The first question evaluates the intensity of pain and the other nine, the effect of pain on daily activities ;Endpoint found 4. Evaluation of the resistance of the trunk musculature that consists in measuring the time that the participant remained in a predefined static position;Endpoint found 5. To evaluate the threshold of pain under pressure, a Kratos® algae, capable of producing pressure in up to 50 kgf, was applied to the paravertebral region of L3 (2 cm lateral to the spinous process) and the mean of the values found (right and left sides) was noted. It was explained to the volunteers that the pain would be evaluated by means of a pressure stimulation technique, and the individual should report the moment when he began to feel it. The evaluation with the pressure gauge was performed by only one evaluator, and the device was used with a metal rod with a rounded tip of 1 cm2, until the volunteer reported the word "pain". After the measurement, the force in kgf necessary to occur the painful stimulus in each individual was noted.

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactGladson Bertolini

Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE)

gladson_ricardo@yahoo.com.br+55-045-32207344

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)