Skip to content

Analysis of lumbar spine movement with mobilization and with digit pressure

Analysis of lumbar spine movement mobilization versus pressure movement mobilization

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-7w84sz
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2019-10-11
Start date
2019-04-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Healthy volunteers

Interventions

The present study aimed to analyze the effects of lumbar spine mobilization using the Mulligan Concept MWM (SNAGS) technique and compare them with a mobilization by digit pressure on the variables of
Other
E01.370.600.550.324
E01.370.405.255
Q65.060

Sponsors

Universidade Federal de Alfenas
Lead Sponsor
Universidade Federal de Alfenas
Collaborator

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Male
Age
18 Years to 30 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Healthy male volunteers aged 18 to 30 years.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Women; male under 18 and over 30 years old; medical diagnosis of neurological diseases; orthopedic; traumatological; rheumatologic diseases that promote changes in static balance or cause chronic pain; uncontrolled arterial hypertension and cutaneous lesions in the lumbar spine / lower limbs that might prevent data collection and / or interventions.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
For the Mulligan group evaluations, the following instruments were used: sociodemographic questionnaire, algometer, baropodometer, traction dynamometer and surface electromyography (EMGs). Initially, sociodemographic information was collected (age, address, telephone, profession) and mass and height . For static balance analysis, the FootWork Pro baropodometer (IST-Informatique, France) was used to observe the body mass distribution, stabilometry and displacement of the body pressure center (COP) in orthostatism. The volunteers were positioned in orthostatism on the platform with equidistant feet, guaranteed by means of a 10 cm template between the medial malleoli of the ankle. The static balance was assessed with blindfolded eyes and ears covered with the aid of a muffler. Three collections of 60 seconds were performed with 60 second rest between each collection, in order to avoid possible fatigue. The data were acquired at a frequency of acquisition of 100 Hz and analyzed in the software FootWork Pro v. 3.2.2.0 - (IST Informatique, France). The analysis of body mass distribution was in the anterior, posterior, left and right regions. For electromyographic evaluation of the rectus femoris, vastus medialis, vastus lateralis and soleus muscles, the Trigno 8 Channel Wireless device (EMGworks, Delsys Inc., Boston, USA) equipped with EMGWorks 4.0 Acquisition software was used. The mode of acquisition of the electromyographic signals was calibrated for a sampling frequency of 1000Hz, calibrated with 1000 times gain, 20Hz high pass filter, 500Hz low pass filter and 60Hz filter to prevent grid interference. To minimize possible interference in the acquisition of the electromyographic signal, the tricotomy and cleaning of the skin with 70% alcohol were performed at the fixation site of the electrodes. The electrodes were fixed on the skin of the volunteer with double face tape and positioned on the muscles to be analyzed as recommended by the European Society of Surface Ele

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The sociodemographic questionnaire, algometer, baropodometer, traction dynamometer and surface electromyography (EMGs) were used for the evaluations of the Digito Pressão group. Initially, sociodemographic information was collected (age, address, telephone, profession) and mass and height.For static balance analysis, the FootWork Pro baropodometer (IST-Informatique, France) was used to observe the body mass distribution, stabilometry and displacement of the body pressure center (COP) in orthostatism. The volunteers were positioned in orthostatism on the platform with equidistant feet, guaranteed by means of a 10 cm template between the medial malleoli of the ankle. The static balance was assessed with blindfolded eyes and ears covered with the aid of a muffler. Three collections of 60 seconds were performed with 60 second rest between each collection, in order to avoid possible fatigue. The data were acquired at a frequency of acquisition of 100 Hz and analyzed in the software FootWork Pro v. 3.2.2.0 - (IST Informatique, France).The analysis of body mass distribution was in the anterior, posterior, left and right regions. For the electromyographic evaluation of the rectus femoris, vastus medialis, vastus lateralis and soleus, the Trigno 8 Channel Wireless device (EMGworks, Delsys Inc., Boston, USA) was used. The mode of acquisition of the electromyographic signals was calibrated for a sampling frequency of 1000Hz, calibrated with 1000 times gain, 20Hz high pass filter, 500Hz low pass filter and 60Hz filter to prevent grid interference. To minimize possible interference in the acquisition of the electromyographic signal, the tricotomy and cleaning of the skin with 70% alcohol were performed at the fixation site of the electrodes. The electrodes were fixed on the skin of the volunteer with double face tape and positioned on the muscles to be analyzed as recommended by the European Society of Surface Electromyography - SENIAM. For positioning of the electrodes and

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactLeonardo Carvalho

Universidade Federal de Alfenas

leounifal@gmail.com+55-35-37011805

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)