Skip to content

Effectiveness of a Novel Multicomponent Treatment in patients with Fibromyalgia: Clinical study

Effectiveness of a Novel Multicomponent Treatment versus Conventional Treatment in patients with Fibromyalgia: Randomized clinical trial, single blind

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-7vyw8p
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2019-06-05
Start date
2019-06-20
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Fibromyalgia

Interventions

Sponsors

Universidad Gabriela Mistral
Lead Sponsor
Universidad de las Americas
Collaborator

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Female
Age
18 Years to 65 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Women subjects whose age range from 18 to 60 years derived to the rehabilitate foundation with medical diagnosis of fibromyalgia based on the criteria of the American College of Rheumatology; subjects reporting moderate pain of at least 4/10 EVA; subjects who can read, write and follow basic instructions in Spanish; subjects that accept and sign the informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Women in stages of pregnancy and / or lactation; women with chronic oncological pain; women with metabolic disorder and / or uncontrolled comorbidities and who present some psychiatric or cognitive alteration that prevents them from participating in the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Expected result 1- It is expected to find a decrease in pain intensity assessed through the numeric pain rating scale in the participants of the novel multicomponent treatment group compared to the standard treatment group. ;Result found 1 - At week 12, we found reductions in perceived pain intensity of 1.4 points (standard deviation 2.9) in the new multicomponent treatment and of 0.18 points (standard deviation 0.4) in care standard. Therefore, the difference between groups instead provides an estimate of the effect of the new multicomponent treatment on the Numeric pain rating scale-1.18 points (eta square=0.47, p<0.001).

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Expected result 2- It is expected to find a improve in functional status assessed through the fibromyalgia questionnaire in the participants of the novel multicomponent treatment group compared to the standard treatment group.;Expected result 3 - It is expected to find a improve in catastrophization assessed through the Pain catastrophizing scale in the participants of the novel multicomponent treatment group compared to the standard treatment group.;Expected result 4 - It is expected to find a improve in fear of movement assessed through the Tampa scale in the participants of the novel multicomponent treatment group compared to the standard treatment group. ;Expected result 5- It is expected to find a improve in sleep quality assessed through the Pittsburgh scale in the participants of the novel multicomponent treatment group compared to the standard treatment group. ;Patients allocated to novel multicomponent treatment showed an improvement in Pain catastrophizing (Mean difference= 19.8, Standard deviation=16.9), the between-group difference in change provided an estimate of the effect of the novel multicomponent treatment on Pain catastrophizing scale was -12.5 (Eta square=0.61, p<0.001).;Patients allocated to novel multicomponent treatment showed an improvement in fibromyalgia questionnaire (Mean difference= 21.6, Standard deviation= 25.5), the between-group difference in change provided an estimate of the effect of the novel multicomponent treatment on fibromyalgia questionnaire was -16.21 (eta square=0.58, p<0.001).;Patients allocated to novel multicomponent treatment showed an improvement in Tampa scale (Mean difference=11.1 Standard deviation=10.1). the between-group difference in change provided an estimate of the effect of the novel multicomponent treatment on Tampa scale was -6.15 (Eta square= 0.52, p<0.001).; Patients allocated to novel multicomponent treatment showed an improvement in Pittsburgh (Mean difference=2.1 Standard deviation=6.2), Theref

Countries

Chile

Contacts

Public ContactFelipe Araya Quintanilla

Universidad de las Americas

fandres.kine@gmail.com+5697122483

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)