Alveolar Bone Grafting
Conditions
Interventions
This is a two-arm, double-blind, split-mouth randomized controlled clinical study. Experimental group: 10 patients with bilateral lower third molars undergoing extraction followed by dentin grafting i
3) osteotomy with minimal bone wear and odontosection using surgical motor and drills under irrigation of sterile 0.9% saline solution
4) tooth avulsion
5) osteoplasty and cleaning of the surgical site
6) repositioning the flap and suturing with 4-0 nylon thread. The suture must be removed 7 (seven) days after surgery. The preparation and processing of the graft will be done with the aid of tungsten
Sponsors
Faculdade de Odontologia de Pernambuco/ UPE
Departamento de Pós-Graduação em Cirurgia e Traumatologia BucoMaxiloFacial
Eligibility
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Aealthy adult patients = 18 years old; who need the removal of two lower third molars with adjacent second molars; who have impacted and mesioangulated lower third molars with similar positioning with the contralateral side; who have continuity of the alveolar walls after extraction; who have gingiva enough keratinized tissue to cover the grafted bone; and who spontaneously accept to participate in this research protocol and sign the Informed Consent Form
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Patients with erupted or semi-impacted mandibular third molars with distoangular, vertical and horizontal positioning; with endocrine/metabolic disorders that may affect bone regeneration; with acute infection; periapical lesion; endodontic treatment; root caries; cystic lesion or tumor associated with teeth; who take/have taken bisphosphonates; smokers; who present loss of one or more alveolar walls after tooth extraction and who are unable to understand the purpose of the study or who do not accept the methodology employed
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| It is expected to find a mean difference in edema, pain, postoperative trismus, probing depth, clinical attachment level and gingival recession, height, width and alveolar volume between the groups studied. | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| No secondary outcomes are expected | — |
Countries
Brazil
Contacts
Public ContactBelmiro Vasconcelos
Faculdade de Odontologia de Pernambuco/ UPE
Outcome results
None listed