Skip to content

Influence of different solvent evaporation temperatures of the adhesive system on the effectiveness of single fill composite resins - Randomized clinical trial

Influence of different volatilization temperatures of the adhesive system on the effectiveness in resin restorations Bulk Fill - Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-7pcxzt
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2020-03-06
Start date
2016-11-20
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

This study was conducted in humans, with the presence of primary or secondary cavities active cavities.

Interventions

18 patients were selected, students of the University of Dentistry of UNOESTE with indication of bilateral restorative dental treatment. Thus, each patient will have two or more restored shallow cavit
Procedure/surgery
E06.323.428

Sponsors

Universidade do oeste paulista
Lead Sponsor
Faculdade de Odontologia de Presidente Prudente
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 25 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Need for restorative treatment in posterior teeth in even number; class I; shallow cavity; pulp vitality; carious lesions; fracture of restorations or replacement of restorations for aesthetic reasons; 18 to 25 years of age, both genders

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: ístimo that surpass ½ of the distance intercuspídica; Medium, deep, or very deep carious restorations; High activity of caries; Parafunctional habits; need for prior periodontal treatment; Absence of occlusion with an antagonist tooth; absence of proximal contact on both sides.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Solvent volatilization of the adhesive system is expected to improve the properties of the hybrid layer by prolonging composite resin restorations. Through a visual and tactile examination, 2 evaluators examined the restorations in 3 periods (15 days after restoration, 6 months and 1 year). will be noted in a table already established by HICKEL, 2007, for clinical evaluations, the scores obtained, and after the data will be submitted to statistical analysis.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary outcomes are not expected

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactSheyla João

Universidade do oeste paulista

sheylaadriane@hotail.com+55-018-996201100

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)