Skip to content

Complete Denture Retained by One Short Implant in resorbed jaws: a prospective study

Overdenture retained by a Single Short Implant in atrophic mandibles: a prospective study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-7p2xmg
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2020-08-13
Start date
2018-05-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

edentulism in older people

Interventions

Experimental group: 18 edentulous patients will be rehabilitated with conventional maxillary dentures and a mandibular overdenture retained by a short single implant. Control group: not applicable, i
Procedure/surgery
E04.545.510.500

Sponsors

Faculdade de Odontologia da Universidade Federal de Goias
Lead Sponsor
Universidade Federal de Goiás
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Present the need to replace or to receive new dentures according to normative criteria and/or own demand (perceived need); Do not have contraindications to the surgical procedure of implant installation (mainly related to uncontrolled systemic diseases, such as diabetes and hypertension); To present reduced bone volume in the mandibular symphysis with a maximum height of 9 mm (base of the chin to the alveolar ridge) for the installation of a short implant without the need for bone grafting procedures; Be able to understand and respond to the questionnaires used in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Unavailability to meet the schedule of return visits; Local conditions that could directly influence the stability and/or retention of the prostheses.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Primary outcome 1: Reduction in the oral health-related quality of life impacts, assessed using the Brazilian version of the OHIP-EDENT questionnaire, which has 19 items which comprise 4 domains: masticatory discomfort (four items), psychological discomfort and disability (five items), social disability (five items), and mouth pain and discomfort (five items). A comparison of this outcome will be made between 4 moments: before the implant installation and 3, 6 and 12 months after overdenture capture.;Primary outcome 2: Increased satisfaction with the prostheses, assessed by means of a questionnaire containing Visual Analogue Scale in relation to the parameters comfort, stability, aesthetics, ability to speak, and ability to chew. A comparison of this outcome will be made between 4 moments: before the implant installation and 3, 6 and 12 months after overdenture capture.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary outcome 2: Maintenance of the peri-implant bone level, measured by means of digital periapical radiographs that will be obtained 1 week after capture of the overdenture and after 6 and 12 months.;Secondary outcome 3: Low incidence of clinical complications and overdentures maintenance events, which will be recorded in the medical records throughout the follow-up period (up to 12 months after intervention).;Secondary outcome 1: Maintenance/non reduction of the implant stability quotient, measured by the Osstell device immediately after implant installation and will be compared with data obtained after 3 and 12 months.

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactCláudio Leles

Faculdade de Odontologia da Universidade Federal de Goias

crleles@odonto.ufg.br55 (62) 3521-1882

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 20, 2026