Skip to content

Strength and Balance training improve functional capacity in institutionalized Elderly

The influence of Strength Training, Endurance and Balance in institutionalized Elderly: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-7nkxkf
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2017-09-11
Start date
2014-10-03
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Falls, loss of functional capacity, balance and strength

Interventions

E02.779.474
13 elderly subjects in the intervention group performed muscle strength exercises with shin guards and elastic bands, balance exercises and unstable surfaces, and stretches lasting 30 minutes of lower
Other
E02.760.169.063.500.387.750

Sponsors

Centro Universitário Metodista Ipa
Lead Sponsor
Centro Universitário Metodista Ipa
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
65 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: To have functional independence through the Barthel index; Be over 65 years of age; Cognition above 30 points in the mini mental state examination, any gender

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: against absolute and relative indications for the six-minute walk test; limiting orthopedic disorders; fracture in the last six months; indication or previous surgery column; Bracing dependence for locomotion as a wheelchair; walker; Crutches; Flares; uncontrolled hypertension ; indication or thoracic surgery in the last six months; dependence on oxygen therapy and cognitive , auditory or visual changes to limit the understanding of assessments and interventions .

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Expected outcome1: the population is expected to gain muscle strength after the intervention. Strength checked through the Kendall scale with strength gradient from 0 to 5 and the sit and stand test where the individual sits and lifts 5 times counting the seconds in which he takes to perform the task;Outcome 1: significant improvement in the muscular strength of the intervention group in the intragroup analysis in adductors and abductors of the right leg with p of 0.02. In the analysis between groups, the improvement occurred in right abductors with p 0.03. It was adopted a level of significance of p less than or equal to 0.05 power of 80 percent;Expected outcome2: the population is expected to improve quality of life after the intervention. Quality of life verified through the Whoqool-old questionnaire specific to the elderly population where there are 6 facets with questions, each facet has a score of 4 to 20, the closer to 20, the better quality of life has the individual ;Outcome found2: significant improvement in the quality of life of the control group and intervention both intra- and between groups with a p of 0.04 in both. It was adopted a level of significance of p less than or equal to 0.05 power of 80 percent;Expected outcome3: the population is expected to achieve improved balance after the intervention. Balance checked through the Berg scale where it contains tasks with closed eyes, stand on one foot and count seconds in which tasks are performed and your score is up to 36 points considered 100 percent risk of falls, from 36 to 54 regular and 56 points excellent balance;Outcome found3: significant improvement in the balance of the intervention group in the intragroup analysis with p less than 0.01. It was adopted a level of significance of p less than or equal to 0.05 power of 80 percent

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Expected outcome1: expected improvement in cardiorespiratory function. Cardiorespiratory fitness verified through the six-minute walk test where the individual walks non-stop in a 30-meter runner for six minutes, before and after the test measurements are performed such as oxygen saturation, systolic and diastolic blood pressure and perception of fatigue respiratory and muscular. An equation is obtained to know the score of each patient, for men it is: DC6m = (7.57 x height, cm) - (5.02 x age, years) - 1.76 x weight, kg - 309m Lower limit of normality = -153m. For women: DC6m = (2.11 x height, cm) - (2.29 x weight, kg) - (5.78 x age, years) + 667m Lower limit of normality = 139m;Outcome 1: improvement of functional capacity in the intervention group intra and between groups with p of both less than 0.01. It was adopted a level of significance of p less than or equal to 0.05 power of 80 percent;Expected outcome2: expected occurrence of falls is expected. Falls through reminder of falls delivered to individuals before and after interventions, without punctuation, only by patient information in the recall;Outcome found2: decrease in occurrences of falls within the 3-month intervention period

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactKacylen Costa da Silva dos Santos

Centro Universitário Metodista IPA/ Federação de Faculdades Metodista do Sul

kacy.cs@gmail.com55-51-996992421

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)