Skip to content

Cerebral Stimulation with Electric Current in children and adolescents with Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in children and adolescents with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-7h5qzf
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2018-09-13
Start date
2015-12-14
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Attention-deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

Interventions

The sample size calculation was performed based on a pilot study and a literature review. Assuming 25% of dropout, our final sample size was 14 subjects. After the selection of the sample of children
E02.331.750

Sponsors

Faculdade de Medicina da Bahia
Lead Sponsor
Faculdade de Medicina da Bahia
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
6 Years to 16 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: right-handed; literate and inserted in regular schools; residing in Salvador or metropolitan region; without pharmacological treatment during the stimulation period; electroencephalogram without epileptogenic activity; consent of those responsible

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: sensory deficit; other neuropsychiatric disorders; epileptogenic discharges on the electroencephalogram

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Expected outcome 1: We expect to find an improvement of attention performance, verified by the TAVIS neuropsychological test, manifest as a reduction in the number of errors or a decrease in response time. ;Observed outcome 1: We did not observe a significant improvement in participants' attention performance mesured by TAVIS test after the proposed intervention.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Expected outcome 2: We expect to find an improvement of attention performance, verified by the secondary neuropsychological tests, including the CORSI cubes test, NEPSY test and Digit span test. ;Expected outcome 3: We aim to evaluate the presence and intensity of adverse effects assessed through a specific questionnaire at each stimulation session, including the most prevalent events found during the sessions;Observed outcome 2: We did not observe a significant improvement in participants' attention performance mesured by the CORSI cubes test, NEPSY test and Digit span test after the proposed intervention.;Observed outcome 3: We did not find difference in the presence and intensity of adverse effects assessed through a specific questionnaire between the TDCS and Sham groups.

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactRachel Guimarães

Faculdade de Medicina da Bahia

rsilvany@yahoo.com.br+55071981278123

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)