Skip to content

The effectiveness of continuous cuff pressure monitoring versus intracuff lidocaine or seal pressure method in preventing postoperative odynophagia in pelvic surgery a randomized clinical study

The effectiveness of continuous cuff pressure monitoring versus intracuff Lidocaine or seal pressure method in preventing Postoperative odynophagia in pelvic surgery a randomized clinical study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-7g5dxr5
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2026-01-13
Start date
2026-01-19
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-02-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Injury of thoracic trachea

Interventions

Randomized controlled clinical study with three parallel arms and single blind masking to be conducted in adult patients with a total sample of one hundred and eleven participants equally allocated in

Sponsors

Rede D'Or São Luiz S.A.
Lead Sponsor
Rede D&apos
Collaborator
Or São Luiz S.A.
Collaborator
Hospital e Maternidade São Luiz
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Adult patients aged 18 years or older; classified as physical status I or II according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists; Mallampati classification grades I to III, with grade III accepted only in the absence of other predictors of a difficult airway; scheduled for elective laparoscopic pelvic surgery; indication for general anaesthesia combined with spinal anaesthesia; requirement for planned orotracheal intubation; surgical positioning in the supine position with a mild Trendelenburg tilt; both sexes

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Refusal to participate in the study; presence of sore throat in the preoperative period; active smoking; prior history of oral or nasal surgery; active upper respiratory tract infection; pregnancy; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; known allergy to any of the medications used in the study; increased risk of aspiration or gastro-oesophageal reflux; requirement for nasogastric tube insertion intraoperatively; presence of clinically relevant cardiopulmonary, neuromuscular, renal, or hepatic disease; use of succinylcholine; requirement for rapid sequence induction; anticipated difficult airway defined as Mallampati classification grade IV; need for more than one orotracheal intubation attempt; patients with a prior history of laryngeal disease; previous tracheostomy; chronic users of opioids or illicit drugs

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
It is expected to assess the occurrence and intensity of postoperative sore throat in patients undergoing orotracheal intubation during pelvic laparoscopic surgery, verified through serial assessments using the Numeric Rating Scale, applied at 1 hour, 6 hours, and 24 hours after extubation, with the outcome defined as the presence of continuous throat pain or discomfort independent of swallowing and quantified on a scale from 0 to 10, in which higher values indicate greater symptom intensity

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
It is expected to assess the occurrence and intensity of postoperative hoarseness and dysphagia, verified through serial clinical assessments using a Numeric Symptom Intensity Scale at the same time points as the primary outcome, with hoarseness defined as difficulty or pain during phonation and dysphagia defined as difficulty or pain during swallowing, both quantified on a scale from 0 to 10, in which higher values indicate greater symptom severity

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactSaullo Silveira

Rede D'Or São Luiz S.A.

saulloqs@usp.br+55-11-931507166

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 7, 2026