Skip to content

respiratory muscle training in healthy subjects

Respiratory muscle strength in healthy university

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-7g48v7
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2020-07-17
Start date
2016-08-18
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Healthy Lifestyle, breathing Exercises

Interventions

The sample will involve 30 subjects equally randomized into three groups: control (GC), transcutaneous electrical diaphragmatic stimulation (GE) and respiratory muscle trainer (GT). The intervention g
Device
E02.779.483.875
E05.723.402

Sponsors

Faculdade de Integração do Sertão
Lead Sponsor
Faculdade de Integração do Sertão
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 30 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Are within the age limit ( 18 to 30 ) ; Not present chronic or acute diseases ; Who accept participate in the study after signing the Informed Consent and Informed ( WIC).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Individuals under 18 and / or greater than 30 years old ; show any acute or chronic disease; Do not agree to participate in the collection; Individuals who fail to answer the research instruments ;

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
We believe is that inspiratory muscle strengthening through a linear pressure load device and transcutaneous electrical diaphragmatic stimulation are able to increase respiratory muscle strength, diaphragmatic index and increase lung function.;The results showed that there was an improvement in respiratory muscle strength with an increase in maximum inspiratory pressure (Pimax) by 36% in the group undergoing diaphragmatic stimulation (GE) and in 32% in the group that performed inspiratory training with a linear pressure load device (GT) after 4 weeks.;We evaluated the Diaphragmatic Index, in an intragroup comparison, there was no significant difference between the initial and final mean of the participants. Although we did not find any significant difference, the participants in the diaphragmatic stimulation (EG) group had an increase of 25%.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
We assessed the level of physical activity of the participants, of the 26 participants who completed the survey, it was possible to observe that the sample was made up mostly of insufficiently active individuals ”(46.2%) according to the IPAQ criteria;Although it was not an expected result, we observed that there was also an increase in expiratory muscle pressure. The GE group increased by ~ 40% and GT ~ 22%.

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactJosé Pinheiro

Universidade Federal do Pampa

jose.eudes86@gmail.com+5555984177356

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)