Skip to content

Movement Learning in children and adolescents living in shelters for a Computer Task

Motor learning in individuals institutionalized by Task of Timing Coincident

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-7fzqbj
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2019-03-13
Start date
2017-03-27
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Learning

Interventions

40 individuals aged between 6 and 16 years, divided into two groups matched by sex and age. Experimental Group: 20 children and adolescents institutionalized in shelters and Control Group: 20 non-inst
Device
F01.525
E01.158

Sponsors

Universidade do Oeste Paulista
Lead Sponsor
Universidade do Oeste Paulista
Collaborator
Associação Prudentina de Educação e Cultura
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
6 Years to 16 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: non-institutionalized and Institutionalized individuals; age group 6 to 16 years; signing of the consent term; signing of the assent term; individuals with reading and writing skills.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Individuals with physical deficits, cognitive and visual.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Expected outcome: Motor learning impairment of institutionalized children and adolescents compared to individuals with typical motor development. Motor learning was analyzed by the Coincident Timing task in computer.;Expected outcome 2: Deficit of psychomotor development of institutionalized children and adolescents compared to individuals with typical motor development. Reviewed by Bateria Psicomotora (BPM).;Expected outcome 3: Deficit in motor control of institutionalized children and adolescents compared to individuals with typical motor development. Evaluated by Fitts Reciprocal Aiming Task speed software 1.0 (Horizontal).;Expected outcome 4: Deficit in reaction time of institutionalized children and adolescents compared to individuals with typical motor development. Evaluated by software Reaction Time Task (TRT).

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary outcomes are not expected.

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactCassia Silva

Universidade do Oeste Paulista

cassia.kelly921@gmail.com+55 18 997995827

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)