Skip to content

Clinical evaluation of Conical and Cylindrical Dental Implants

Clinical evaluation of primary and late stability of Conical and Cylindrical Implants: randomized clinical study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-7fpb5z6
Enrollment
20
Registered
2026-05-15
Start date
2023-08-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Partially edentulous

Interventions

This is a randomized, open-label, two-arm clinical study. Individuals over 18 years of age, male or female, will be included. The selected individuals must be free of uncontrolled systemic pathologica

Sponsors

Centro Universitario do Maranhão-Uniceuma
Lead Sponsor
Centro Universitario do Maranhão-Uniceuma
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Individuals over 18 years of age; male or female; sign the free and informed consent form (TCLE); have Edentulism in the region of the upper left or right first molar; be free of uncontrolled systemic pathological conditions (ASAI or ASAII); have sufficient bone volume in the region of the upper first molar for the installation of implants measuring 4 mm in diameter and 10 mm in length; be free of lesions and pathological processes in the teeth or in the region to be operated on

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Smoking volunteers; under 18; with some pathological process; with an absence of bone tissue that makes it impossible to install dental implants

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
expected outcome 1: It was expected that despite the macro-geometric differences and the installation in low-density bone, neither type of implant would achieve primary stability levels sufficient to allow early or immediate prosthetic rehabilitation.;Outcome found 1: Implants with conical and cylindrical macrogeometry presented primary stability for early loading when installed in low-density bones

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
expected outcome 2: It was expected that late stability (60 and 90 days) remains adequate and similar between the groups;outcome finded 2: The conical implant showed upward stability, with stability values ??not decreasing in the first 60 days. In 90 days, the two implants achieved similar stability rates

Countries

BR

Contacts

Public ContactOswaldo Neto

Centro Universitario do Maranhão-Uniceuma

oswaldoserra88@hotmail.com+55(98)32144212

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jun 11, 2026