Dysphonia
Conditions
Interventions
Sponsors
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Vocally healthy participants - women aged 18 to 45; no vocal complaints or laryngeal injuries; neutral vocal quality. Dysphonic participants - women aged 18 to 45; with complaints or altered vocal quality or diagnosis of benign lesions of the larynx
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Pregnant women; women in the premenstrual period; with an allergic reaction, and/or respiratory condition on the day of the assessment; with a systemic, neurological, and/or neoplastic disease; smokers; women who had been previously submitted to speech-language-hearing and/or surgical treatment due to voice changes; who were photosensitive or had a skin disease/lesion; who had a tattoo in the region where light would be applied; and those who reported taking skin treatment medications
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Expected outcome 1: It is expected to find an improvement in vocal quality with measurement using the Visual Analog Scale.;Outcome found 1: An improvement in vocal quality was found after the experiments, with a reduction in the average degree of dysphonia from 37.67 to 34.53 in the analysis of sustained vowels and from 32.07 to 31.07 in connected speech;Expected outcome 2: We expected to find an increase in maximum phonation time after the experiment, with measurement of maximum sustained emission time in seconds;Outcome found 2: An increase in the mean maximum phonation time from 9.13 to 10.13 seconds was observed after experimental treatment;Expected outcome 3: Evaluate change in multiparametric indices and cepstral measures from acoustic analysis;Outcome found 3: There was an increase in the mean cepstral peak prominence-smoothed (CPPS) from 12.66 to 14.11 dB;Expected outcome 4: It is expected to observe a reduction in phonatory effort after the experiment with measurement using the Phonatory Effort Scale (Borg CR10-BR adapted for vocal effort);Outcome found 4: The Borg CR10-BR Scale adapted for vocal effort showed a reduction in phonatory effort from 3.4 to 1.53;Expected outcome 5: Evaluate change in laryngeal configuration after perceptual-visual image analysis ;Expected found 5: There was an improvement in the vibratory pattern of the vocal folds in 60% of the participants after experimental treatment | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| No secondary outcomes expected | — |
Countries
Brazil
Contacts
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais