Skip to content

Evaluating the use of peripherally inserted central catheter exclusively for parenteral nutrition

Evaluating the use of peripherally inserted central catheter exclusively for parenteral nutrition - randomized study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-78rd57
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2016-08-16
Start date
2016-07-15
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Newborn

Interventions

nitially all newborns in neonatal intensive care unit who have insertion indication of central catheter peripherally inserted - PICC, for infusion of parenteral nutrition and who meet the inclusion an
Procedure/surgery
C01.539

Sponsors

União Brasileira de Educação e Assistencia
Lead Sponsor
Hospital Universitário de Santa Maria - HUSM
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
0 Weeks to 3 Months

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: All newborn UTINeo that the intern with prescription parenteral nutrition NP and indicating insertion of a peripherally inserted central catheter PICC for this purpose.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: RN diagnosed with clinical or laboratory sepsis according to the criteria of ANVISA 2010; PICC RN in which the location is not in focus; Newborns with umbilical catheter; Check-list of PICC insertion procedure with scores below 10; Failure to obtain the consent of parents or guardians to participate in the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Compare the rates of infection in newborns admitted to Neonatal Intensive Care Unit associated with the use of PICC mono lumen compared to the double lumen , and in the latter , a unique route for infusion of parenteral nutrition. Thus, considering the rate of bloodstream infection of 30% , a significance level of 5 %, an 80 % power of a difference between groups of 20 % is considered significant.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
• Compare the frequency of isolated germs in the bloodstream in newborns who used the PICC mono lumen compared to the double lumen . • determine and compare the incidence of complications such as difficulty of progression of the catheter , inappropriate location, clogging, leakage \ edema, phlebitis, thrombosis, myocardial perforation , displacement, disruption, among others, associated with the use of the PICC mono lumen relative to double lumen . • Compare the PICC dwell time for the infusion of NP in newborns who used the mono lumen catheter in relation to the double lumen . • Determine the frequency of the need for peripheral accesses ( veno- punches ), and the PICC in newborns who used the mono lumen catheter in relation to the double lumen . • Compare the frequency and type of complication associated with the use of peripheral catheter , relative to the PICC, the participants.

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactCristine de Oliveira

União Brasileira de Educação e Assistencia

pediatria-pg@pucrs.br+55 (55) 96197688

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)