Skip to content

Comparison between skin closure with single and intradermal points on the knee prosthesis

Comparative analysis between single and intradermal skin cloruse in total knee arthroplasty

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-78dh5d
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2020-07-29
Start date
2016-03-03
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gonarthrosis

Interventions

The skin sutures in total knee arthroplasty were performed by the same surgeon, with techniques and materials defined by randomization. The patients were divided into three groups: Group 1 (control)-
Procedure/surgery

Sponsors

Hospital Universitario Ciencias Medicas
Lead Sponsor
Hospital Universitario Ciencias Medicas
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
45 Years to 85 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients with primary or secondary gonarthrosis; with indication of total knee arthroplasty; aged 45 to 85 years; both sexes.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with a previous history of knee surgery; with inflammatory diseases of the joints; smokers, i.e. at least 1 cigarette a day; alcoholics with consumption equal to or greater than 15 doses per week for men and 10 doses per week for women; with hypoalbuminemia, i.e. albumin level below 3.5 mg per dl and anemia with hemoglobin less than 10 mg per dl.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Expected Outcome 1: For the analysis of wound cosmesis in the third postoperative month, we expect a score above 4 on the Broke Stone Scar scale on the knees submitted to an intradermal suture with a non-absorbable barbed thread and less than 3 with the other techniques.;Outcome 1: A mean of 3.30 was observed in the knees with intra-dermal suture using barbed suture and a mean of 3 for intra-dermal suture using Monocryl suture, with p 0.70. The suture with simple sutures using nonabsorbable suture presented a mean of 1.91, with p less than 0.05 compared to other methods.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Expected Outcome 2: In the evaluation of knee pain in the third postoperative month, we expect pain above 5 on the visual analogue pain scale in the group submitted to intra-dermal suture with absorbable uniform and less than 3 in the other two groups.;Outcome 2: A mean pain of 3.48 was found in patients undergoing intra-dermal suturing with barbed wire and 2.75 with intra-dermal suturing with Monocryl wire, with p 0.55. Patients submitted to suturing with simple sutures and unabsorbable sutures had a mean of 2, with a static difference compared to patients in the group that used barbed sutures.

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactRodrigo Vieira

Hospital Universitario Ciencias Medicas

rbarreirosvieira@hotmail.com+55 31 992012055

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)