FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of Effectiveness in the Control Of Pain In Surgery Between Articain 4% With Adrenaline 1:100.000 and Lidocaina 2% With Adrenaline 1:100.000 In Inferior Third Molars Extractions: Randomized Clinical Study

Comparison of effectiveness in the control of transoperatory pain between articaine 4% with adrenaline 1:100.000 and lidocaina 2% with adrenaline 1:100.000 in inferior third molars extractions: randomized clinical study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-785c8h
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2019-08-27
Start date
2019-06-08
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Non-erupted third molars. Molar.

Interventions

Experimental group: 30 patients of both genders, without systemic disorders, that will be performed mandibular third molars extractions, split-mouth model, with different anesthetics, one being 4% art
Procedure/surgery
D02.886.778.150
D02.065.199.092.500

Sponsors

Faculdade de Odontologia da Universidade Federal do Ceará campus Sobral
Lead Sponsor
Faculdade de Odontologia da Universidade Federal do Ceará campus Sobral
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 45 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Pacients with correct indication for third molars removal;both genders; with ages between 18 and 45 years; indication analyzed with imaginological exams ( panoramic or periapical radiographic); without any systemic diseases without any periodontal disease; simetric mandibular third molars, with similar class and position;With 2/3 of root formation;pacients that agreed with the Consent Term

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Pacients with acute pericoronaritis and supuration; Bone lesions associated with mandibular third molars; Pacients with no agreement to the study; Pacients ASA III, IV,V and VI; Pacients with presence use of drugs that can may be affect the cicatricial process; Pacients with only one mandibular third molar; Pacients with unsimetric mandibular third molars

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
It was expected results that confirm the current literature or the contraposition of the same, regarding the best anesthetic base postoperative pain control is the articaine (contraposition of the literature) or reaffirm the literature (lidocaine) with a delineation.Using the randomizend comparision method, split-mouth model, between two symmetrical teeth to be extracted with different anesthetic, using the visual analogue pain scale number to verify differences between two procedures.;1. Increased efficacy of 4% articaine in controlling intraoperative pain over 2% lidocaine. 2.Faster anesthetic induction time for 4% articaine over 2% lidocaine—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
No secundary results are expected—

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactJosfran Filho

Universidade Federal do Ceará

josfranf@hotmail.com+ 55 088 997623464

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)