FindTrial
Sign In

Effects of Physical Exercises in Group and at Home for the Elderly

Effectiveness of a Supervised and Unsupervised Exercise Program for the Elderly: a Randomized Controlled Trial - : Research Ethics Committee of the Universidade do Sagrado Coração

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-778wr4
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2017-10-02
Start date
2017-10-15
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Frail Elderly, Depression, Musculoskeletal Pain, Quality of Life, Activities of Daily Living.

Interventions

Supervised Higher Education Group: 30 elderly people with complete higher education will carry out group exercises of warm up (10 '), aerobic physical exercises (20'), static and dynamic balance exerc
Other
G11.427.410.698.277.968
E02.760.169.063.500.387.750
E02.760.169.063.500.387
E01.370.600.425
G11.427.683

Sponsors

Universidade do Sagrado Coração
Lead Sponsor
Secretaria Municipal de Saúde
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
60 Years to 110 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Fragile elderly; Age above 60 years; Both sexes; Any level of schooling

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Severe cognitive impairment; Severe motor impairment; Severe hearing deficit; Severe vision deficit; Temporary or permanent incapacity to wander; Elderly in the terminal stage.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Differentiate the Fragility Syndrome regression between the supervised and unsupervised group and the different levels of schooling, evaluated by the Fragility Phenotype that measures the weight loss in kilograms reported in the last year, the average palmar grip strength in kilograms, the (Kcal / min) = 0.0175 kcal x kg -1x min.-1x MET x body weight (kg), and fatigue due to fatigue sensation in the Activities. Reduction of signs indicative of depression, evaluated by the Geriatric Depression Scale score before onset and after the end of internment. Improvement in quality of life, assessed by the Whocol-Bref questionnaire score before and after the intervention. Functional independence gain, assessed by the Katz Score and the Lawton Scale score before and after the end of the inpatient stay. Increase in functional capacity, evaluated by the Six-Minute Walk Test before beginning and after the end of the intervention, calculated by the ratio of the percentage of distance covered over the predicted. Decreased musculoskeletal pain, assessed by the Nordic Questionnaire and Numerical Pain Scale before and after the intervention.—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
An improvement of at least 5% of the variables evaluated by the same methods of the initial evaluation after the intervention is expected is expected.—

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactIago ;Letícia Padovani;Carnaz

Universidade do Sagrado Coração;Universidade do Sagrado Coração

i.padovanifisio@hotmail.com;lecarnaz@gmail.com55-14-998476937;55-14-998258771

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)