Skip to content

Evaluation and satisfaction of methods for labor induction

Interventions for improving success rates and satisfaction in labor induction: B.O.M. study - B.O.M. Balloon, Oxytocin, or Misoprostol

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-76xg97x
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2024-10-29
Start date
2024-11-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Labor, induced

Interventions

This is a randomized clinical trial with 4 open arms. Randomization will be stratified by Robson groups (1-4 and 5.1), considering nulliparous and multiparous patients, with or without a history of pr
group 2 receiving only the Foley catheter, with the possibility of using misoprostol later based on cervical conditions
group 3 receiving Foley catheter + oxytocin simultaneously
and group 4 receiving Foley catheter followed by oxytocin after removal of the Foley catheter. The sample size of 492 patients was estimated to compare the four induction methods, with groups of equal

Sponsors

Hospital da Mulher Professor Doutor José Aristodemo Pinotti da Universidade Estadual de Campinas
Lead Sponsor
Universidade Estadual de Campinas
Collaborator

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Female
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Women above 18 years old; nulliparous and multiparous women; gestational age of 37 weeks or more; single pregnancy; cephalic presentation; intact membranes; bishop score of 6 or less; and cervical dilation of 2 centimeters or less

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients who have any contraindication to vaginal birth; category 3 fetal heart rate tracking; presence of hemolysis; elevated liver enzymes and low platelet syndrome (HELLP); eclampsia; growth restriction below the 10th percentile (Hadlock growth curves) with reversed flow in doppler studies of the umbilical artery; restriction below the 5th percentile with elevated, absent, or reversed flow on doppler studies of the umbilical artery

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
It is expected that labor induction using combined methods will be associated with a shorter time between the start of induction and delivery, as well as a higher success rate for vaginal delivery

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Evaluate the rate of vaginal deliveries between the groups receiving combined parallel intervention versus serial intervention;Expand knowledge on labor induction and the factors associated with the success and satisfaction of the procedure

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactAdriana Luz

Universidade Estadual de Campinas

adriluz@unicamp.br+55(019)35219304

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)