Stress urinary incontinence
Conditions
Interventions
Clinical analysis and quality of life questionnaire in patients undergoing surgery to correct urinary incontinence for at least 5 years. The case group with an average of 40 patients were submit to th
Other
E05.318.308.980
Sponsors
Centro Universitário Saúde ABC - FMABC
Centro Universitário Saúde ABC - FMABC
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
Female
Age
18 Years to 100 Years
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Patients over the age of 18 years; absence of associated neurological diseases; patients previously submitted to surgical treatment to correct urinary incontinence, either by transobturing sling or mini-sling; patients who accept to attend and undergo the proposed procedures.
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Pregnancy; acute urinary infection; sequelae of high exposure to ionizing radiation
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| The expected outcome is not to find superior quality of life in patients who underwent urinary incontinence correction with mini-sling compared to transobturation sling, after at least 5 years of the procedure, using a quality of life questionnaire, analysis with pad test and study urodynamic, based on the monitoring and behavior of these groups, which was performed up to 1 year after surgery. | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Secondary outcomes are not expected. | — |
Countries
Brazil
Contacts
Public ContactFaculdade de Medicina do ABC Departamento de Ginecologia e Obstetricia
Centro Universitário Saúde ABC - FMABC
Outcome results
None listed