Skip to content

Effects of scapula exercises in patients with Fracture of the distal radius

Effectiveness of adding scapular control exercises to kinetic treatment in patients with distal radius fracture: Randomized simple-blind clinical study - : RCT

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-75h3nz
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2018-02-06
Start date
2018-01-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

distal epiphysis radius fracture

Interventions

The control group will have 51 patients and will receive a kinesic treatment program, this consists of 15 minutes of active wrist and hand exercises in EESS turbidity at a temperature of 34ºc
then apply joint mobilization in the radio-carpal joint, in the first two weeks will be performed oscillatory techniques according to Maitland , in the remaining weeks will be performed sliding techn
the exercise of graduated grip grip control with a biofeedback of visual pressurization
the exercise of graduated control of the inverted dart with precision of the first interosseous space. Based on the premise of avoiding muscle pain and fatigue, a job of low load and short duration wi
Other
E02.779.474

Sponsors

Universidad de las Americas
Lead Sponsor
CDT Hospital San Borja de Arriaran
Collaborator

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: subjects over 60 years of age derived from the Adult Traumatology Service of the San Borja Arriarán Clinical Hospital, with a medical diagnosis of multifrectional extraarticular type FRD according to the AO classification, treated conservatively with closed reduction plus immobilization with plaster. Subjects that accept and sign informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Subjects presenting some immediate complication after removal of immobilization , painful regional complex type I, carpal tunnel syndrome, etc. subjects presenting a shoulder pathology diagnosed at least 1 year before the occurrence of the DRF, subacromial pinching syndrome, partial or total rupture of the rotator cuff, glenohumeral instability, adhesive capsulitis, etc.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
functionality To assess the functionality prior to the start of treatment and at the end of the treatment, the DASH questionnaire will be used. The sample size was calculated using the Stata 12.0 program, and the necessary initial data was extracted from the study conducted by Gong et al. Patients with FRD treated with immobilization with gypsum plus a kinesic treatment program, at the sixth week showed an average of 50.7 with a Standard Deviation (SD) of 24.4 points in the DASH questionnaire. Taking into account the study by Franchignoni et al, we established as a minimum clinically important difference a reduction of at least 15 points for the experimental group compared to the control. To detect this difference between both treatments, with a value of P = 0.05 (probability of committing a type I error) and a statistical power of 80%, a minimum of 42 patients per group is needed, we also consider adjusting the size of the shows for possible losses, for that we will recruit 20% more of the required patients in each group. According to this, the authors of the present study have proposed as experimental hypothesis that there is a reduction of at least 15 points in the DASH questionnaire in the group treated with scapular control exercises added to the kinesic treatment compared with the group that received only kinesic treatment . As positive results, we expect there to be significant differences between EG and GG in the final year of a 12-week treatment program.;When comparing the results between both treatments at the end of week 6, the DASH questionnaire showed a difference of 16.7 points (p = 0.000), the wrist function with PRWE showed a difference of 1.5 points (p = 0.541).

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
wrist functionality To assess the wrist functionality prior to treatment and after treatment, the PRWE validated questionnaire will be used, an increase in its score is expected at the end of the treatment;Pain To evaluate the pain intensity prior to treatment and after treatment, the analogous visual scale (VAS) will be used, expecting a decrease after the intervention.;When comparing the results between both treatments at the end of week 6, the movement pain measured with EVA showed a decrease of 1.7 cm (P = 0.000)

Countries

Chile

Contacts

Public ContactFelipe Araya

Universidad de las Americas

fandres.kine@gmail.com+5697122483

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)