Skip to content

Tranexamic acid in total hip arthroplasty

Tranexamic acid in primary non-cemented total hip arthroplasty

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-75bwry
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2017-01-09
Start date
2013-12-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hip artritis / Total hip replacement

Interventions

Drug
E07.695.400.400
A sample was divided into two groups. The control group underwent total hip prosthesis of Non cemented as the usual protocol Used at the National Institute of Trauma - Orthopedics. The group case , wa

Sponsors

Instituto Nacional de Traumatologia e Ortopedia
Lead Sponsor
Instituto Nacional de Traumatologia e Ortopedia
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
15 Years to 90 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Primary total hip replacement

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Prior surgery same Joint;infecton;congenital coagulopathies carriers acquired;intravascular coagulation Active;acute occlusive vasculopathy;Hypersensitivity components of the formula;chronic use of oral anticoagulants and corticosteroids;allergy background or faced to transfusion plasma;Carriers of chronic diseases;Patients with malignant neoplasias and autoimmune diseases;need for bone grafting;revision surgeries;no concordance with the written informed consent and informed

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Reduction of bleeding during the early post operative, verified by measuring the bleeding by the formula that uses the variation of hematocrit pre and post operative ;Blood loss was 1,163 mL in the control group and 652.9 mL in the treated group (p <0.0001).;Reduction in the need for postoperative blood transfusion, verified by the volume of red blood cells used in the postoperative period.;The need for postoperative blood transfusion was lower in the treated patients (14.1% vs 32%, p = 0.001). In addition, a lower volume of packed red blood cells was used in the treated group (300 mL) than in the control group (600 mL) (p <0.0001).

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Reduction of the fall in the value of postoperative Hb and Ht.;In the treated group, there was a reduction of 12.9% in the Hb value and 13.1% in the postoperative Ht, whereas in the control group there was a 23% decrease in the Hb value and 22.7% in the Ht value Postoperative (p <0.0001).;Reduction in hospital stay time in the treated group.;Although the median hospitalization time was the same in both groups, in the control group the variation in hospitalization time was 3 to 5 days, while in the treated group it was 3 to 7 days (p = 0.0001 ).

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactOsamu Kimura

Instituto Nacional de Traumatologia e Ortopedia

ortopediaquadril@gmail.com+55(21)21345000

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)