Skip to content

Acute effect of different modalities of electric current therapy for the control of pain and temperature in people with Knee Osteoarthritis

Immediate effects of different electrotherapy modalities in the control of pain and temperature of individuals with knee Osteoarthritis

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-74ffv8
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2018-10-25
Start date
2019-03-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Knee Arthrosis

Interventions

The electrotherapy sessions will be conducted at the University of Brasília, on the FCE campus (Faculty of Ceilândia). This is a randomized, double-blind clinical trial with 4 groups, consisting of 3
E02.331
E03.091

Sponsors

Faculdade de Ceilândia da Universidade de Brasília
Lead Sponsor
Fundação de Ensino e Pesquisa em Ciências da Saúde da Secretaria de Estado da Saúde do Distrito Federal
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
60 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Aged 60 years or older; engage in a minimum of 45 minutes per week of accumulated physical activity at a moderate intensity level; report a pain intensity equal to or exceeding 4 cm on a 10-cm visual analogue scale

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Individuals who had undergone physiotherapy in the previous 3 months; received knee injections in the previous 6 months; had medical constraints, such as cardiorespiratory, neurological, or rheumatological dysfunctions; had undergone prior hip, knee, or ankle surgery; had chronic conditions leading to knee pain

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Expected outcome 1: It is expected to find a reduction of at least 30% in pain, verified through the Numeric Verbal Scale (NVS) method, between the pre and post-intervention periods.;Outcome found 1: A reduction of 30% or more in pain was observed in all groups, verified through the Numeric Verbal Scale (NVS) method, between the pre and post-intervention periods.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Expected outcome 3: no significant difference in range of motion is expected, as assessed by the painful and total range of motion test, between the pre and post-intervention periods.;Outcome found 3: no significant difference in range of motion was found, as assessed by the range of motion test, between the pre and post-intervention periods.;Expected outcome 2: no differences in temperature are expected, as verified through the thermography method, between the pre and post-intervention periods.;Outcome found 2: no differences in temperature were found, as verified through the thermography method, between the pre and post-intervention periods.

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactCamila Almeida

Faculdade de Ceilândia da Universidade de Brasília

cadenacamila@gmail.com+55 (61) 996794277

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)