Skip to content

Electrical Stimulation and Voice: Immediate Effects in Women with Voice Disorders

Comparison of the immediate effects of low-frequency and modulated medium-frequency TENS electrical currents on the self-perception and vocal quality of dysphonic women

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-742f68t
Enrollment
60
Registered
2026-03-19
Start date
2024-04-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-03-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dysphonia Voice disturbances

Interventions

This is a randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial with a crossover design and six intervention conditions. A total of 60 women participated, including 30 with behavioral dysphonia and 30 v
Group 2 – Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) combined with vocal exercises
Group 3 – Burst Modulated Alternating Current (BMAC)
Group 4 – Burst Modulated Alternating Current (BMAC) combined with vocal exercises
Group 5 – placebo electrostimulation
and Group 6 – placebo electrostimulation combined with vocal exercises. Participants were unaware of the type of electrical current applied, ensuring participant blinding. Furthermore, there was a sep

Sponsors

Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
Lead Sponsor
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
Collaborator

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Female
Age
18 Years to 50 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Women with an otorhinolaryngological diagnosis of behavioral dysphonia, aged between 18 and 50 years. For the non-dysphonic group, women with self-reported good health, without vocal complaints or alterations, aged between 18 and 50 years, will be included.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: For both groups: pregnant women; individuals with self-reported health conditions such as cardiac, pulmonary, hearing, neurological, or psychiatric disorders, or a diagnosis of organic dysphonia; those who have previously undergone speech-language therapy for voice; and those who have previously received electrotherapy for any type of treatment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Expected outcome 1: A reduction in musculoskeletal pain is expected after the electrotherapy interventions, while pain intensity is expected to remain unchanged after the placebo condition and in the vocally healthy group;Observed outcome 1: A reduction in musculoskeletal pain in the laryngeal region and in areas proximal to the larynx was observed across all intervention groups, including the placebo condition, in the dysphonic group. Data from the vocally healthy group have not yet been collected

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Expected outcome 2: A decrease in the multiparametric acoustic measures Acoustic Voice Quality Index (AVQI) and Acoustic Breathiness Index (ABI), along with an increase in Cepstral Peak Prominence Smoothed (CPPS), is expected for all intervention groups except for the placebo condition, with no changes expected in the vocally healthy group;Observed outcome 2: No differences were found in the acoustic parameters after any of the electrotherapy modalities, including the placebo condition, and no differences were observed among women with behavioral dysphonia. Data from the vocally healthy group have not yet been collected to date

Countries

BR

Contacts

Public ContactLarissa Siqueira

Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte

larisiqueira_4@hotmail.com+55-84-33429738

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Apr 4, 2026