Skip to content

Evaluation of an App for Prescribing Home-Based Exercises for Common Musculoskeletal Conditions

Feasibility and Effectiveness of a Digital Tool for Prescribing Home-Based Physical Exercises for Prevalent Musculoskeletal Conditions

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-735p6cp
Enrollment
42
Registered
2026-04-27
Start date
2026-05-04
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Knee osteoarthritis

Interventions

This is a non-randomized, non-controlled, single-arm clinical study without blinding. Experimental group (single group): forty-two individuals with common musculoskeletal conditions will receive eight

Sponsors

Universidade Estadual de Campinas
Lead Sponsor
Departamento de Clínica Médica
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Individuals with shoulder impingement syndrome; or nonspecific low back pain; or greater trochanteric pain syndrome; or knee osteoarthritis; or patellofemoral pain syndrome; or Achilles tendinopathy; under regular follow-up at Hospital de Clínicas – Unicamp; who are not undergoing physiotherapy; and who have no plans to start physiotherapy in the next three months

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Volunteers who do not have a smartphone; incompatible smartphone; a prosthesis that prevents performing the exercises; decompensated psychiatric disorder; under 18 years of age

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
An improvement in musculoskeletal symptoms is expected, assessed by the standardized mean difference of the combined symptom metrics for each condition (Shoulder Pain and Disability Index, Oswestry Index, Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment for Gluteal Tendinopathy, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, Lysholm score, and Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment–Achilles), based on a statistically significant change between the pre- and post-intervention periods

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Good adherence to the app is expected, assessed by the proportion of exercises completed relative to those prescribed, with a rate of at least fifty percent;Acceptable satisfaction with the use of the app is expected, assessed using the mHealth Satisfaction Questionnaire, with a score greater than 15/30 after use;Good safety of the app is expected, assessed by the number of adverse events classified according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), with fewer than 10 percent of adverse events considered mild or moderate;Good safety of the app is expected, assessed by the number of severe adverse events classified according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), with no severe events reported;Improvement in symptoms for each condition is expected, assessed by improvement in each specific metric (Shoulder Pain and Disability Index, Oswestry Index, Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment for Gluteal Tendinopathy, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, Lysholm score, and Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment–Achilles), based on a statistically significant improvement between the pre and post-intervention periods

Countries

BR

Contacts

Public ContactJean De Souza

Universidade Estadual de Campinas

souzajm@unicamp.br+55(19)3521-9211

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jun 11, 2026