Cellulite
Conditions
Interventions
Sponsors
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Women; aged between 18 and 49 years, with body mass indexes (BMIs) in between 18.5 of 39.9 kg/m; menstruation cycle; with no prior experience with carboxythrapy and with the presence of Grade I or light and II or moderate cellulite in the gluteal region
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Pregnant women; breastfeeding women; women with metabolic and autoimmune dysfunctions; women presenting dermatological lesions in the gluteal region; women who underwent surgical procedures in the gluteus; women with a history of epilepsy; presence of malignant or benign tumours; heart disease and/or use of a pacemaker; hypoesthesia or anaesthesia in the gluteal region; women with organ dysfunction who participate in CO2 metabolism and elimination; such as renal failure; diuretic use; chronic pain (over 3 months);
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| It is expected to find no difference in the analgesic effect between the currents, but there may be differences regarding the sensation of comfort of the currents in the different groups. The method used will be the Numerical Pain Scale (NDT) for pain intensity assessment. It will be used to evaluate the pain intensity of the participants. It is a simple and easily applied scale that assesses the individual's perception of the intensity of their pain (Annex 3). It consists of a numerical sequence of 11 points, ranging from 0 to 10, where value 0 represents “no pain” and value 10 represents “worst possible pain”(33). Pain intensity will be measured in all study groups. The evaluation of this parameter will be done verbally, in which the patient must report the intensity of her pain at the end of each carboxytherapy puncture. This procedure will occur in all sessions and at the end of the study, pain intensity will be compared at three different times, with a total of 3 sessions. ;It is expected to find a difference in the sensation of comfort of the current, being expected that the medium frequency, aussie and interferecinal are more comfortable. The method used to evaluate sensory comfort will be through the Visual Analog Pain Scale: Sensory comfort will be measured with a 10 cm visual analog scale (VAS) where the subject will be asked to draw a perpendicular line on the VAS line, the closer the 0 cm will be, the more comfortable the current and the closer to 10 cm, the less comfortable the current will be(34). The evaluation of this parameter will be done verbally, in which the patient should report the current comfort after 1 minute of the current amplitude adjustment. | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| No secondary outcome | — |
Countries
Brazil
Contacts
Universidade Federal de São Carlos- UFSCar