Skip to content

The use of the Body using as a therapeutic ally in Speech-Language Clinic: comparative analysis of language and vocal aspects in adults who Stutter - randomized clinical trial

Psychomotricity and Stuttering in Speech-Language Clinic: Comparative Analysis of Perceptual-Auditory and Acoustic Vocal aspects, Temporal Processing and Severity in Adults who Stutter - Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-6yy775
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2019-04-01
Start date
2017-10-06
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stuttering [stammering]

Interventions

The intervention proposal for the control group (CG) will have its basis linked to traditional speech-language therapy. The intervention process in fluency disorders can occur in various ways, such as
cognitive interventions
motor speech intervention (combined or not with cognitive elements)
pharmacological interventions, among others. Classical speech-language therapy uses multiple elements formed by the permutation of the elements above. For the proposed therapy, the intervention for th
Behavioural
Other
E01.370.600.115

Sponsors

Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
Lead Sponsor
Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
16 Years to 40 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Volunteers aged between 16 and 40 years of age; of both genders; previously diagnosed with Developmental Stuttering, with stuttering severity between scores of "Light to Moderate" and "Very Severe", based on Stuttering Severity Instrument for Children and Adults (SSI-3)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Volunteers aged out of the proposed; significant behavioral changes; psychiatric and/or cognitive disorders; attend some other type of speech therapy at another institution/clinic during the intervention; or irregular behavior or frequency, which may compromise the accuracy of the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Stuttering Severity Instrument for Children and Adults (SSI-3) - Expected Outcome I Reduction of post-intervention score in 10 points (5 points being more or less), veryfied by agreement between two blind evaluators, with 8 point minimum difference between the groups, with 5% significance level, in pre and post-interventions measurements. The parameters evaluated in the primary outcome are: frequency of disfluencies found, duration of stuttering episodes and physical concomitants, having equal weight in assessing the severity of stuttering. At the end of the study, it is expected to find a decrease in the final score obtained, and, consequently, the attenuation of the stuttering severity found before intervention.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
GRBASI Scale - Expected Outcome II Decrease of the score in each degree of the scale, verified by the degree of agreement between the evaluators, with variation in 1 point (being 0.5 for more or less) in the pre and post intervention measurements. The parameters evaluated in this scale are: G - General Degree of Dysphonia; R - Rough; B - Breath; A - Asthenia; S - Strain; and I - Instability. It is expected a decrease in the score found post-intervention in each parameter, mainly in General, Rough and Strain.;Consensus of Perceptual-Auditory Assessment of Voice (CAPE-V) - Expected Outcome III Decrease in overall score and in each grade specified in the protocol, verified by the degree of agreement between two evaluators, with variation in 10 points (being 5 for more or less), in the pre- and post-intervention measurements. The parameters evaluated in this protocol are: general degree of vocal disorder, roughness, breathiness, strain, pitch, loudness and resonance. It is expected to find a decrease in the absolute scores found, mainly in the roughness and strain, as well as the general grade.;Noise Disturbances Measures (jitter, shimmer, GNE proportion) - Expected Outcome IV Decreased absolute values were found, verified by acoustic analysis from voice recording in the VoxMetria® program, based on the observation of a variation of at least 5% in the pre- and post-intervention measurements. The measures that will be analyzed are jitter, shimmer and GNE proportion, being expected the decrease of the absolute values found.;Phonation Deviation Diagram - Expected Outcome V Decrease in the absolute values found in the graph, verified by acoustic analysis from the voice recording in VoxMetria® program from the observation of a variation of at least 5% in the pre- and post-intervention measurements. The phonation deviation diagram is a graph from the crossing of values between glottic noise (GNE; axis of ordinates) and the measures of irregularity (jitter, shimmer axi

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactJorge Junior

Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro

fariasjr.jorge@gmail.com+55 (21) 99701-4045

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)