Skip to content

Homeopathy versus Sertraline for depression

Homeopathy versus Sertraline - HOMEO-CON study: Homeopathy on the continuation phase of depression treatment

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-6y5dcb
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2015-06-25
Start date
2014-08-05
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Depressive episode

Interventions

Experimental group: 110 patients with a depressive episode diagnosis will receive an individualized homeopathic medicine in fifty-millesimal potencies (LM or Q potencies) Control group: 110 patients
Drug

Sponsors

Unidade de Saúde Escola da Universidade Federal de São Carlos
Lead Sponsor
Unidade de Saúde Escola da Universidade Federal de São Carlos
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
No minimum to 70 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Subjects should meet the criteria for a depressive episode (single or recurrent) following a Structured Clinical Interview,SCID; capacity and willingness to give informed consent and to comply with study procedures will also be required.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Dysthymia; psychotic, chronic or double depression; intolerance to sertraline or a negative previous experience with the drug; bipolar disorder; schizophrenia or other psychotic disorders; substance dependence (except tobacco); bulimia or anorexia, clinical significant chronic disease that could hinder study visits or depression evaluation; suicide attempt up to 12 months before screening; treatment with antidepressants or mood stabilizers 4 weeks prior to the screening; homeopathic treatment 8 weeks prior to study entry; psychotherapy, meditation or acupuncture during the study; participation in a previous clinical trial 3 months prior to screening; concomitant pregnancy or breastfeeding; epilepsy; concomitant use of anticoagulants; patients who are assumed to have a linguistic, intellectual or any other reason for not understanding the meaning of the clinical trial and for not complying with the necessary study procedures.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Mean score on the Montgomery & Åsberg – (MADRS) after twelve weeks

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
MADRS mean score (with the exception of the primary endpoint); response and remission rates, quality of life (SF-12), at weeks 2, 4, 8, 16, 20, and 24; adverse events and dropouts during the whole trial.

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactUbiratan;Ubiratan Adler;Adler

Unidade de Saúde Escola da Universidade Federal de São Carlos;Unidade de Saúde Escola da Universidade Federal de São Carlos

ubiadler@outlook.com;ubiadler@outlook.com55(16)3351 9405;+55 (16) 3351 8340

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)