Skip to content

Effects of Mirror Therapy on motor function of the paretic upper limb in chronic stroke

Effects of Mirror Therapy on the motor function of the paretic upper limb of individuals affected by Stroke in the chronic phase

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-6wf5hpt
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2024-10-15
Start date
2022-08-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ischemic stroke

Interventions

This study employed a quantitative design to investigate the effects of Mirror Therapy on individuals with chronic stroke-induced upper limb impairments. Participants were recruited from a convenience

Sponsors

Centro Educacional de Lavras
Lead Sponsor
Centro Educacional de Lavras
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Age 18 years or older; clinical diagnosis of unilateral ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke;at least six months post-stroke; presenting with upper limb hemiparesis; no severe spasticity in the paretic upper limb (Modified Ashworth Scale score less than 4); no significant cognitive impairments (Mini-Mental State Examination score of 24 or higher for those with formal education, and 14 or higher for illiterate individuals);individuals with no visual impairments that would hinder their ability to observe movements in the mirror

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Participants who missed more than 30% of Mirror Therapy sessions were excluded; individuals already receiving physiotherapy for their paretic upper limb were excluded from the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Expected outcome: The aim of the study was to evaluate the effects of Mirror Therapy on the motor function of the paretic upper limb in patients in the chronic phase of stroke, and, according to other published studies, these effects were expected to be beneficial, meaning that an improvement in the motor function of the affected limb was anticipated.;Outcome: A significant improvement in the motor function of the paretic upper limb was observed after the intervention. Among the evaluated criteria, those showing the greatest improvement were: passive movement (p=0.0138), flexor synergy (p=0.0107), movements with and without synergy (p=0.0414), hand function (p=0.0149), and the overall FMA score (p=0.0057).

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Expected outcome: The secondary objective of the study was to assess the degree of spasticity in the paretic upper limb using the Modified Ashworth Scale, and according to one of the inclusion criteria, grades 0, 1, 1+, 2, and 3 were expected to be observed.;Outcome: The degree of spasticity in the paretic upper limb remained unchanged, meaning no alterations were identified after the intervention. Therefore, a predominance of participants with spasticity grade 2 was observed.

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactLaiz Guimarães

Centro Educacional de Lavras

laiz@unilavras.edu.br+55 (35) 36948110

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)