Loss of teeth due to accident
Conditions
Interventions
Dental implants will be installed following the conventional bone drilling protocol for the implantation of dental implants with different burs with increased diameter in a staggered manner until the
Procedure/surgery
E06.892
Sponsors
Universidade Federal de Pelotas
Universidade Federal de Pelotas
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: This project will be submitted for approval by the Research Ethics Committee of the UFPel School of Dentistry, prior to its completion. To be included in the sample, patients will need to have the following characteristics: Present edentulism with an indication of dental implant installation and subsequent dental prosthesis or indication of extraction of a dental element by crack/fracture or root perforation with an indication for immediate dental implant installation and subsequent dental prosthesis; Have a good general state of health that allows dental implant surgery; Have time and time available to attend dental appointments at institutions.
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Patients with any of the following characteristics may not be part of the sample: Patient with any systemic disease that prevents surgery for dental implant installation; Patients with a history of chemo/radiotherapy in the last 10 years or who use systemic medications that may interfere with bone repair (eg, bisphosphonates); Patients who do not have time available for care in educational institutions.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Primary outcomes The primary outcome to be evaluated will be the survival of implants, which refers to the implant being in its position of installation, at the moment of consultation, regardless of the condition of the other components / tissues related to it (bone, soft tissue, prosthetic abutment). screw, prosthetic crown, etc.) (Zarb and Albrektsson, 1998). | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Secondary outcomes relate to the success of the implant, and the fact that all surrounding tissues have a satisfactory condition (Zarb and Albrektsson, 1998). For this study the outcomes evaluated will be probing depth, gingival bleeding, gingival retraction, bone loss around the implant, volumetric change and peri-implant soft tissue condition, and patient satisfaction. | — |
Countries
Brazil
Contacts
Public ContactMateus dos Santos
Universidade Federal de Pelotas
Outcome results
None listed