Skip to content

Clinical efficacy of distance exercises associated with professional telephone follow-up for patients with neck pain

Effect of a telerehabilitation exercise protocol in subjects with chronic neck pain: a randomized controlled trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-6vbsmb
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2020-01-06
Start date
2020-02-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

neck pain

Interventions

The patients allocated to the telerehabilitation group (n=49) will receive 10 sessions of treatment over a period of six weeks (two sessions/week). Participants will perform at each stretching, mobili
Other
E02.760.169.063.500.387

Sponsors

Universidade Federal de São Carlos
Lead Sponsor
Universidade Federal de São Carlos
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 65 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Participants between the ages of 18 and 65 years, neck pain for at least 3 months, with or without radiating pain, no history of significant injury to the neck or upper thoracic spine (car accident), experiencing pain during the physical exam.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients will be excluded if they had undergone cervical spine surgery or cervical spine stenosis, reported neurological signs, severe pain (>7/10) during muscle strength measurements, rheumatic and/or inflammatory diseases (ankylosing spondylitis, rheumatoid arthreitis), cervical instability, spinal cord involvement or congenital diseases affecting the musculoskeletal system, major psychological disease (severe depression or mental disorder), pregnancy, and any intervention that included exercise or physical therapy in the last 3 months.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Reduction of pain intensity, assessed using the numeric pain scale, change from baseline pain at 6 weeks.;Reduction of disability, assessed using the neck disability index, change from baseline disability at 6 weeks.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Maintenance of pain intensity, assessed using the numeric pain scale, after 3 months of follow-up.;Maintenance of disability, assessed using the neck disability index, after 3 months of follow-up.;Reduction of kinesiophobia, assessed using the tampa scale of kinesiophobia, change from baseline kinesiophobia at 6 weeks and after 3 months of follow-up.;Reduction of catastrophic thoughts, assessed using the pain catastrophizing scale, change from baseline catastrophic thoughts at 6 weeks and after 3 months of follow-up.;Reduction of fear-avoidance beliefs, assessed using the fear avoidance beliefs questionnaire, change from baseline fear-avoidance beliefs at 6 weeks and after 3 months of follow-up.;Reduction of anxiety and depression symptoms, assessed using the hospital anxiety and depression scale, change from baseline anxiety and depression symptoms at 6 weeks and after 3 months of follow-up.;Improvement of pain self-efficacy, assessed using the pain self-efficacy questionnaire, change from baseline pain self-efficacy at 6 weeks and after 3 months of follow-up.;Improvement of global perceived effect, assessed using the Global Perceived Effect Scale, change at 6 weeks and at 3 months of follow-up.

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactLuiz Fernando;Marcos Approbato Selistre;de Noronha

Universidade Federal de São Carlos;La Trobe University

lfaselistre@gmail.com;M.DeNoronha@latrobe.edu.au+55-016-33518397;+61-3-54447231

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)