FindTrial
Sign In

Clinical evaluation of different delivery methods of At-home bleaching with 10% Hydrogen Peroxide

Sensitivity and Genotoxicity assessment in adolescents submitted to Bleaching with Strips or Trays

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-6th7rt
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2017-07-26
Start date
2015-06-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stained teeth

Interventions

In this study, two bleaching strip systems containing 10% hydrogen peroxide gel (G1 and G2) were evaluated, compared to a traditional 10% hydrogen peroxide gel (G3), in relation to sensitivity, effect
Other
E06.420.750

Sponsors

UFAM - Universidade Federal do Amazonas
Lead Sponsor
UFAM - Universidade Federal do Amazonas
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
15 Years to 20 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Volunteers had between 15 and 20 years; at least one central incisor or canine with A2 or darker color; six upper anterior teeth restorations-free on the buccal surface.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Volunteers with systemic diseases (metabolic, immunological and cardiopathies); periodontal disease; enamel showing changes; volunteers with braces; severe crowding; presence of intrinsic stains; use of anti-inflammatory drugs; smoking; drinking; in pregnancy or lactation.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Degree of sensitivity of bleaching agents based on PH to 10%, through scores on the VAS or NRS scales, during the two weeks of bleaching treatment ;The absolute risk sensitivity showed no different statistically (p > 0.09), but the intensity of tooth sensitivity of different groups was statistically different for both scales (p = 0.04, p = 0.03 for VAS and NRS scales, respectively)—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Effectiveness of different forms of application, their genotoxic potential and their impact on quality of life related to oral health, through color guides, cellular analysis and validated quality of life questionnaires, respectively, pre and post intervention;There were no significant statistical differences for the secondary outcomes. Significant bleaching was observed in all groups, after 30 days of clinical evaluation, no significant difference between them (p > 0.06). The frequency of micronuclei showed no statistical difference (p > 0.08). QVRSB they picked up instruments impact on quality of life.—

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactDiego;Maria Fulgância Cordeiro;Bandeira

UFAM - Universidade Federal do Amazonas;UFAM - Universidade Federal do Amazonas

diego.scordeiro@hotmail.com;fulgencia@ufam.edu.br5592991531358;559233054924

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)