Skip to content

Custom-made articulated ankle-foot Orthoses associated with home-based mobility tasks improve functional mobility and autonomy compared with fixed Orthoses in patients with Stroke: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Influence of the Ankle-foot Orthosis on the motor function and gait of patients after Ischemic Stroke

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-6sf2vv
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2018-03-05
Start date
2018-04-04
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Interventions

Control group: 50 stroke patients referred from the Stroke Unit (Unesp Botucatu), who have an indication for the use of both ankle-foot orthoses (articulated and fixed). The randomization process will
E07.858.442.660.430.750

Sponsors

Faculdade de Medicina Botucatu
Lead Sponsor
Faculdade de Medicina Botucatu
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 90 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Individuals who can use both types of orthoses in the treatment; who suffered an ischemic stroke within one year; both genders; who have a previous Rank less than or equal to 3; who are able to walk with or without a walking aid for five uninterrupted minutes; who received the orthosis through the rehabilitation clinic of the Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Lower limb amputation; non-ambulatory patients (Rankin 4 and 5); blindness; severe motor aphasia; late phase of stroke (after 12 months) and patients with progressive neuromuscular diseases

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Evaluate functional mobility using the Tinetti Mobility and Balance scale. The data before and after the use of the orthosis will be analyzed through statistics, where p < 0.05 will be established for statistical significance.;Evaluate balance using the Timed Up Go Test. The data before and after the use of the orthosis will be analyzed through statistics, where p < 0.05 will be established for statistical significance.;Assess the level of functional ambulation using the scale Functional Ambulation Classification (FAC)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Evaluate the level of functional capacity using the Barthel index (BI). The data before and after the use of the orthosis will be analyzed through statistics, where p < 0.05 will be established for statistical significance.;Evaluate the levels of anxiety and depression using the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS). The data before and after the use of the orthosis will be analyzed through statistics, where p < 0.05 will be established for statistical significance.;Evaluate the quality of life using the European (5D) Quality of Life Scale (Euroqol). The data before and after the use of the orthosis will be analyzed through statistics, where p < 0.05 will be established for statistical significance.;Evaluate the degree of severity of the neurological deficit using the NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS). The data before and after the use of the orthosis will be analyzed through statistics, where p < 0.05 will be established for statistical significance.;Evaluate the level of disability using the modified Rankin scale (ERm). The data before and after the use of the orthosis will be analyzed through statistics, where p < 0.05 will be established for statistical significance.;Evaluate the spasticity level of the affected lower limb using the modified Ashworth scale (ASm). The data before and after the use of the orthosis will be analyzed through statistics, where p < 0.05 will be established for statistical significance.;Evaluate patient satisfaction in relation to the orthosis offered and the team that served them through the Quebec B-Quest scale (2.0), with scores ranging from 5 to 60, with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction with the equipment and with the service team.;Evaluate human functioning using the ICF (The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health) checklist. The presence or absence of impairment was rated in terms of the body function and structural domains (0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3= severe, and 4 = complete). In the

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactGabriela de Paula

Faculdade de Medicina Botucatu

gvieiradepaula@gmail.com+55018996412568

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)