Aging
Conditions
Interventions
This is a parallel-group randomized controlled trial with a 1 for 1 allocation ratio. A total of 110 women aged 60-75 years will participate, who do not have cognitive and/or motor limitations that wo
G11.427.410.698.277
Sponsors
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
Female
Age
60 Years to 75 Years
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Be over 60 years old; woman; active; participate in the university extension project
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Be under 60 years old; sedentary; not participate in the university extension project
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Expected outcome 1: It is expected that after a 16-week period of detraining, there may be a partial or complete loss of the adaptations induced by resistance and multicomponent training on functional capacity, handgrip strength, and anthropometric variables in older adults. On the other hand, it is believed that a 16-week period of retraining could lead to the recovery of these adaptations;Found Outcome 1: In the Chair Sit-to-Stand test, after detraining, there was a significant reduction of 19.1% in the number of repetitions performed. However, after the retraining period, there was a recovery of 14.5%. For the elbow flexion test, after detraining, there was a significant decrease of 16.5% in the number of elbow flexions, and after retraining, the average increased by 21.4%. For the Sit-and-Reach test, after detraining, although not significant, there was a loss of 77.3% in flexibility. However, after retraining, flexibility significantly improved by 128.2%. In the Seated, Walk 2.44, and Return-to-Sit test, although no significant changes were observed between the time points, a slight increase of 3.2% in the time taken to complete the test was noted after detraining, and a decrease of 7.8% after retraining. Similarly, the Reach Behind the Back test showed a slight decrease of 3.3% in flexibility after detraining and an increase of 11.1% after retraining. Finally, in the stationary march test, after detraining, there was a significant decrease of 10.1% in the number of executions performed, and after retraining, an increase of 13.6%. In manual grip strength, a significant difference was observed, F=22.914, in the comparison between the means of initial versus post-detraining and post-detraining versus post-retraining | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| No secondary outcomes are expected | — |
Countries
Brazil
Contacts
Public ContactFlávia Melo Ferreira
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
Outcome results
None listed