FindTrial
Sign In

Two techniques for osseous preservation after tooth extracton: a clinical study

Assessment of two different techniques for alveolar preservation and patient reports - NA: NA

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-6nrnk9
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2020-09-25
Start date
2020-10-31
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

bone remodeling

Interventions

Group 1 (Test - n=17): patients will receive a bone substitute (hydroxyapatite 60% + B-TCP 40%) and dense PTFE membrane
placed with the ice cream technique without flap. Group 2 (Positive Control- n=17): patients will receive a bone substitute (hydroxyapatite 60% + B-TCP 40%) and dense PTFE membrane placed in a traditi
Procedure/surgery
E04.680.300.500

Sponsors

Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
Lead Sponsor
Universidad Científica del Sur
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Individuals with 18 years-old or older and periodontally healthy; less than 10 percent bleeding on probing without obvious periodontal pockets; present a non-molar tooth with extraction indicated; Type II or I sockets; Present a cone beam computed tomography (up to 1 month) of the region; No history of systemic diseases that contraindicate the surgical procedure, including the need for antibiotic prophylaxis; Do not use continuous use drugs including anti-inflammatory steroids and non-steroids; Present at least two tooth adjacent to the element that will be extracted; Not be pregnant or breastfeeding.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Not able to attend postoperative evaluations; Presenting symptoms of infection or hypersensitivity in the operated area; Smokers or ex-smokers (less than one year); Patients with fractures of the vestibular bone at the time of extraction with more than 50% loss of vestibular wal; Extractions with complications/accidents lasting more than 45 minutes

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To Evaluate Hard Tissue Changes by CBCT, measured by area percentage ;To evaluate Soft Tissue Changes by Digital Scanning, measured by area percentage—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Postoperative pain levels assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) ;VAS scores for swelling and bleeding ;To evaluate Oral Health related quality of life with Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP14)—

Countries

Peru

Contacts

Public ContactTiago Fiorini

Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul

fiorinitiago@gmail.com+5551981154654

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)