Skip to content

Effect of Infrared LEDs compared to Respiratory Therapy Maneuvers in the Treatment of Community Pneumonia

Comparison of Infrared LED with Respiratory Physiotherapy Maneuvers in the Treatment of Community-Acquired Pneumonia - CAP Community-acquired pneumonia

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-6n573b
Enrollment
30
Registered
2019-06-05
Start date
2019-05-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-03-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pulmonary Ventilation

Interventions

This is a prospective, descriptive, and longitudinal clinical trial study. Volunteers will be divided into 2 groups (15 individuals each), randomly assigned according to patient demand and hospitaliza
s clinical condition, during 7 sessions, and conventional treatment with antibiotic therapy associated with respiratory physiotherapy through specific bronchial hygiene maneuvers (vibration and vibroc
s respiratory capacity will be measured through the strength of the respiratory muscles using Pimax and Pemax

Sponsors

Centro Universitário de Itajubá
Lead Sponsor
Centro Universitário de Itajubá
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
55 Years to 85 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Participants aged 55-85 years; with a clinical diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia (Streptococcus pneumoniae); undergoing conventional respiratory physiotherapy treatment; on oxygen therapy up to 1 L/minO2 and on antibiotic therapy (azalides, cephalosporins, fluoroquinolones); both sexes

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients diagnosed with fungal and viral pneumonia; with hospital-acquired pneumonia (those hospitalized for more than 2 days in the previous 90 days); institutionalized; overweight (Body Mass Index – BMI: above 29.9 kg/m2); who do not sign the Informed Consent Form; who do not belong to the stated age range; who have neoplasms and a history of photosensitivity

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Expected outcome 1: Improvement in the infectious condition and consequent pulmonary function, with a reduction in hospital stay time in patients using infrared LED photobiomodulation. ;Finding outcome 1: Improvement in the infectious condition, clinical condition, and pulmonary function, with a reduction in hospital stay time in patients using infrared LED photobiomodulation.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Expected Outcome 2: Improvement in ventilatory mechanics, respiratory muscle strength, and the patient's clinical condition (respiratory repercussions, pulmonary auscultation, and pulse oximetry) is expected after the use of infrared LED photobiomodulation;Finding Outcome 2: There was an improvement in the pulmonary recovery process and clinical picture, a reduction in respiratory symptoms, a decrease in hospital stay time (9.3 vs. 7.3 days) (p<0.001), an increase in peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) (88.3 to 98%), in maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP) (-40 to -65.3 cmH2O), in forced vital capacity (FVC) (62% to 80%) (p<0.001), and an improvement in hematological data, such as erythrocytes (3.51 to 5.54 mm³), typical lymphocytes (40 to 31%), and hemoglobin (12.3 to 14.6 mg/dL) (p<0.05), as well as in pulmonary auscultation (6.1 to 3.1 days) (p<0.001). It is considered a relevant adjuvant treatment with conventional therapy, as it improved the pulmonary and clinical status of patients, reduced respiratory symptoms, and decreased the length of hospital stay

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactPâmela Pereira

Centro Universitário de Itajubá

pamela.pereira@fepi.br+55(35)3629-8400

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Mar 14, 2026