Skip to content

The use of Aromatherapy associated with Massagem on Stress from a nursing staff at the surgical center

Aromatherapy with Massage on Stress from a nursing staff at the surgical center

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-6mgqn3
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2017-09-11
Start date
2016-07-04
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Occupational Diseases

Interventions

Intervention Group: Nineteen nursing staff with at least a low level of stress received six aromatherapy massages on alternate days that lasted 10 to 15 minutes. The massage protocol consisted in the
Other
E02.190.599.750.750

Sponsors

Departamento de Enfermagem da Universidade Estadual Paulista
Lead Sponsor
Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu
Collaborator
Universidade Estadual Paulista
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 60 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Healthy volunteers; both genders; age between 18 and 60 years; to be working regularly in the sector (surgical center); to consent participate in the research by signing the Free and Informed Consent Form; achieve a minimum score of 12 points on Vasconcelos Stress Symptom List; olfactory acceptance of the odor of lavender (Lavandula angustifolia) and geranium (Pelargonium graveolens) essential oils; and declare not being pregnant.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Loss of follow-up of aromatherapy massage sessions.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Expected outcome: decrease in stress scores verified by applying the Stress Symptom List (nationally validated instrument) evidenced by moving to a less intense stress level after six aromatherapy massage sessions.;Outcome found: There was no change to less intense levels of stress. There was observed a decrease in the scores of stress levels through the application of Stress Symptoms List (validated instrument nationally) after six sessions of massage with aromatherapy, however, the statistical analysis did not detect significance between experimental and control groups, considered p-value 0.05. Statistical data of the intragroup analysis: Control Group: LSS before 45,11 (SD 30,62); after 44.44 (DP 30.54), p-value = 0.99. Intervention Group: LSS before 52.15 (DP 30.04); after 46.31 (SD 30.42), p-value = 0.92. Statistical data from the intergroup analysis: LSS before-control group 45.11 (SD 30.62) and intervention group 52.15 (SD 30.04), p-value = 0.87. LSS after-control group 44.44 (SD 30.54) and the intervention group 46.31 (SD 30.42), p-value = 0.92.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Expected outcomes: decreased manual heart rate, assisted by digital clock, before and after each aromatherapy massage session. Decrease of systolic blood pressure verified by aneroid sphygmomanometer, before and after each session of aromatherapy massage. Decrease in diastolic blood pressure as measured by an aneroid sphygmomanometer before and after each aromatherapy massage session.;Outcome founds: There was a decrease in heart rate for all six aromatherapy massage sessions with statistical significance, considered p-value 0.05. There was a decrease in systolic blood pressure for all aromatherapy massage sessions with statistical significance, considering p-value 0.05. There was a decrease in diastolic blood pressure for all sessions of massage with aromatherapy, however, statistical analysis showed significant result only from second to sixth massage session, considering p-value 0.05. Statistical data of heart rate (intervention group): 1st session - 66.53 (13.96); 57.97 (9.52); p-value <0.0001; 2nd session - 65.32 (SD 9.74); 59.11 (DP 9.52); p-value <0.0001; 3rd session - 64.11 (DP 9.24); 59.26 (DP 9.80); p-value <0.0001; 4th session - 66.75 (SD 10.29); 62.05 (DP 10.31); p-value <0.0001; 5th session - 62.53 (SD 8.17); 57.05 (SD 11.76); p-value <0.0091; 6th session - 65.26 (SD 8.04); 57.05 (DP 8.11); p-value <0.0001. Statistical data of systolic blood pressure: 1st session - 120.53 (SD 15.08); 107.26 (DP 12.41); p-value <0.001; 2nd session - 123.68 (DP 13.00); 111.05 (DP 12.43); p-value <0.001; 3rd session - 125.79 (DP 13.46); 112.63 (DP 12.84); p-value <0.001; 4th session - 128.95 (DP 9.80); 115.79 (DP 9.61); p-value <0.001; 5th session - 131.58 (DP 18.34); 119.47 (DP 15.45); p-value <0.001; 6th session - 124.74 (SD 16.11); 112.63 (DP 12.84); p-value <0.001. Statistical data of diastolic blood pressure: 1st session - 71.42 (SD 18.61); 69.37 (DP 7.95); p-value = 0.59; 2nd session - 78.42 (DP 7.65); 68.95 (DP 7.37); p-value <0.001; 3rd session - 77.63 (DP 7.

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactEliana;Thiago Braga;Domingos

Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu;Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu

elmara@fmb.unesp.br;thiagosd7@hotmail.com55(14)3008-1001;55(14)3008-1001

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 23, 2026